Suicide Nineteen Days After Grace Begins and Eleven Months After Revival
Kabir Nair, 39, bought a ₹40 lakh term plan in 2019 with an annual premium of ₹9,200 and a policy anniversary of 1 September. He paid three premiums, then defaulted on the 1 September 2022 renewal and the policy lapsed after the grace period. He revived it on 1 October 2023 by paying arrears of ₹9,200 plus interest of ₹1,150, supported by a standard health declaration that he had received no medical treatment in the preceding five years. In fact he had been under psychiatric treatment for depression since 2022. The 1 September 2024 renewal premium was still unpaid when he died by suicide on 20 September 2024. The insurer's investigation obtained his psychiatric records, and the medical section confirms that the treating psychiatrist had recorded suicidal ideation in July 2024. The nominee, his mother, files the claim. The insurer is unsure whether to pay ₹40 lakh, refund a part of the premiums, or repudiate for non-disclosure.
1. Is the full ₹40 lakh payable? Work through the suicide clause and the grace period.
Read the worked answer
Grace period first. The renewal premium due 1 September 2024 was unpaid at death on 20 September 2024. Under a 30-day grace period on non-monthly modes, the policy remains in force until 1 October 2024, so the cover had not lapsed and the claim is maintainable. Had this been an accidental death, the ₹40 lakh would have been payable less the unpaid premium of ₹9,200.
The suicide exclusion. The standard clause excludes full payment where death by suicide occurs within 12 months of commencement of risk or of revival; in that case the nominee is entitled to at least 80% of the premiums paid, provided the policy is in force. Death on 20 September 2024 is 11 months and 19 days after revival on 1 October 2023, so the exclusion applies and resets the clock from revival, not from the original 2019 commencement.
The computation. Premiums paid were three at ₹9,200 (2019, 2020, 2021) plus the revival arrears premium of ₹9,200, i.e. ₹36,800. The revival interest of ₹1,150 is not a premium and is excluded. 80% of ₹36,800 = ₹29,440 payable to the nominee. Nothing is deducted for the unpaid 2024 premium because the insurer is refunding premiums rather than paying a sum assured.
2. Does the concealment of psychiatric treatment at revival justify outright repudiation instead?
Read the worked answer
The legal route exists but is risky, and the file is weak.
Section 45 with revival as a reference date. The three-year window runs from the later of issue, commencement, revival or rider. Revival on 1 October 2023 opens a fresh three-year period, so the insurer may call the policy in question on the ground of misstatement, here the false declaration that no treatment had been taken in five years while under psychiatric care since 2022. Before doing so it must communicate the grounds and materials in writing and allow a response; where fraud is established it may forfeit premiums under the proviso to Section 45(2).
Why the insurer should hesitate. (i) It revived a term plan on a self-declaration without asking for medicals, so it accepted the risk on the proposer's word. (ii) Materiality of depression for mortality is arguable but requires medical opinion, not assertion, and the ombudsman and consumer forums weigh the insurer's own underwriting laxity. (iii) Fraud must be proved, not inferred from silence; a depressed man concealing his illness is a different case from a calculated fraud.
Recommended position. Pay the defined benefit of ₹29,440 under the suicide clause, record the investigation findings, and reserve the right to re-examine revival practice internally. Repudiation, if attempted, should be a written, reasoned order after hearing the nominee, not a silent denial.
3. If the nominee disputes the settlement, what are the timelines and escalation routes?
Read the worked answer
Insurer's obligations. The insurer must decide on the claim within the timelines prescribed by the IRDAI (Protection of Policyholders' Interests) Regulations, ordinarily within 15 days of receiving the last necessary document and with a documented extension where investigation is needed. Any delay in payment attracts interest at the bank rate plus 2%. A repudiation must be communicated in writing with reasons; an unexplained or one-line rejection is itself a service deficiency.
Escalation ladder for the nominee:
- Written complaint to the insurer's grievance redressal officer; the insurer must resolve it within 14 days, and must state the complaint reference and the grievance officer's details in the policy documents.
- If unresolved or rejected, escalate on IRDAI's Bima Bharosa portal or to IRDAI's policyholder protection machinery.
- Insurance Ombudsman under the Insurance Ombudsman Rules, 2017 (as amended in 2021): a complaint must be filed within one year of the insurer's rejection, jurisdiction depends on the policyholder's address, and the Ombudsman can pass an award up to the prescribed monetary limit, currently ₹50 lakh. The forum is free and does not require a lawyer.
- Civil suit or consumer commission as an alternative, though courts generally defer to the Ombudsman route on a ₹29,440-scaled dispute only where the insurer's conduct is unreasonable.
Practical note: the agent should give the nominee the claim reference, the grievance route and the one-year Ombudsman limitation in writing rather than leaving her to discover it.