Comma Splice and Pronoun Agreement in a Report Sentence
An officer drafts this sentence for an incident report: "The suspect was combative, he refused to comply with verbal commands, and when the backup unit arrived they observed the suspect still yelling and the officers had to restrain him." A supervisor flags the sentence as grammatically flawed and asks for a corrected version that preserves all the facts. The officer must also decide whether the sentence belongs in the narrative or the summary section of the report.
1. Identify the grammatical errors in the sentence and rewrite it correctly without losing any facts.
Read the worked answer
Errors:
- Comma splice: "The suspect was combative, he refused to comply..." joins two independent clauses with only a comma. Fix with a semicolon, a period, or a coordinating conjunction.
- Pronoun-antecedent ambiguity: "they observed" - "they" most naturally refers to "the backup unit," which is fine, but the sentence's structure makes "they" momentarily ambiguous with "the suspect." Better to name the unit.
- Faulty parallelism / run-on tail: "...still yelling and the officers had to restrain him" stacks clauses without clear structure.
Corrected version: "The suspect was combative and refused to comply with verbal commands. When the backup unit arrived, its officers observed the suspect still yelling; the officers then restrained him."
This keeps every fact: combative, refused commands, backup arrived, suspect yelling, restraint applied.
2. Should this sentence go in the narrative or the summary? Justify your choice.
Read the worked answer
Narrative. The sentence contains sequential, time-ordered actions (combative → refused commands → backup arrived → still yelling → restrained). That is the definition of narrative content: what happened, in order, with detail.
Summary is for the bottom-line outcome (e.g., "Suspect was restrained and taken into custody without further incident"). Putting the play-by-play in the summary would duplicate the narrative and bury the conclusion.
Rule of thumb: Summary answers "what was the result?"; narrative answers "what happened, step by step?" This sentence answers the second question.
3. Rewrite the sentence in past tense, active voice, and third person, using "the suspect" and "the backup officers" as the only subjects.
Read the worked answer
Rewrite: "The suspect was combative and refused to comply with verbal commands. The backup officers arrived and observed the suspect still yelling. The backup officers then restrained the suspect."
Checks:
- Past tense throughout (was, refused, arrived, observed, restrained). ✓
- Active voice (officers observed / officers restrained, not "the suspect was observed"). ✓
- Third person (no "I" or "we"). ✓
- Only two subjects used: "the suspect" and "the backup officers." ✓
- No facts lost: combative, refused commands, backup arrived, yelling, restrained. ✓