Board Investigation, Altered Records, and Ex Parte Contact
A Nevada chiropractic physician, Dr. Okafor, receives a letter from the Board stating that a former patient complained that he billed her insurer for spinal manipulation and electrical stimulation on 26 visits when she received only massage and heat. The Board's investigator requests complete patient records by a date certain and schedules an informal interview. Dr. Okafor's office manager has already added late entries to the file 'to make the records complete.' Dr. Okafor's friend, a current Board member, offers to 'talk to the investigator' privately. The insurer has also sent a demand for repayment and a fraud questionnaire. Dr. Okafor wants to ignore the Board until the insurer finishes, refuse the interview, and settle the Board case by paying a fine without a hearing.
1. How should Dr. Okafor respond to the Board's records request and interview? What about the late entries?
Read the worked answer
He should respond within the deadline, in writing, and preserve the original records exactly as they are. Ignoring the Board because an insurer is also investigating is not a safe strategy; the two processes can run in parallel. He may ask for a short extension for counsel, but he should not simply refuse. The Board's investigator is entitled to the requested records if the request is authorized, and failure to cooperate can itself become a disciplinary issue.
The late entries are a serious problem. Records should be contemporaneous. If a late entry is truly necessary, it must be clearly labeled as a late entry with the date it was actually made, and it must not be backdated or inserted to look contemporaneous. Adding entries after a complaint to 'make the records complete' can look like falsification or spoliation. He should not delete or rewrite anything. He should preserve metadata, emails, schedules, and billing records, and he should retain counsel before the interview. At the interview, he may be accompanied by counsel, should answer truthfully, and should not guess.
2. What due process rights apply if the Board pursues discipline, and what sanctions are possible?
Read the worked answer
The Board must proceed under Nevada's contested-case framework. Dr. Okafor is entitled to notice of the charges, a hearing before the Board or its designee, the opportunity to present evidence and witnesses, the right to cross-examine adverse witnesses, the right to counsel, and a decision based on the record. He cannot be disciplined by a private hallway conversation or by an informal demand alone. A settlement is possible, but it must be voluntary and informed; paying a fine without a hearing may be a negotiated resolution, not a substitute for process if he contests the facts.
Possible sanctions include a reprimand, fine, probation with conditions, required CE, practice monitoring, suspension, or revocation, depending on the findings. Fraudulent billing, false records, and failure to cooperate are separate grounds. The Board may also consider restitution to the insurer or patient. The ex parte offer from a Board member is improper. Dr. Okafor should decline it and document the offer. A Board member should not discuss a pending case privately with a party, and doing so could taint the proceeding.
3. How should he handle the insurer's fraud questionnaire and repayment demand?
Read the worked answer
The insurer's inquiry is separate from the Board case, but the answers must be consistent and truthful. He should not ignore the questionnaire, and he should not send a bare denial if the records show discrepancies. He should reconcile the appointment schedule, treatment notes, billing codes, and payments. If services were billed but not documented or not rendered, he should correct the claim and consider repayment. If the discrepancy is a coding error, he should explain the correction; if it reflects intent, the exposure is much greater.
He should avoid contacting the patient about the complaint. He should route the insurer response through counsel if fraud is alleged, preserve all documents, and provide only what is requested. The Board may share information with the insurer or other agencies, and a false statement to the insurer can become a new Board issue. The practical sequence is: preserve records, obtain counsel, correct any billing error, respond to the Board on time, and prepare a truthful reconciliation for both proceedings.