NV Dental Hygiene Jurisprudence study materials
NV Dental Hygiene Jurisprudence study resources

The Bruise, the Chart Note, and the Autoclave Log

NV Dental Hygiene Jurisprudence · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Bruise, the Chart Note, and the Autoclave Log

Hygienist Tasha is seeing a 74-year-old woman who lives in an assisted-living facility. The patient has fresh bruising on both wrists and says her niece, who is also her caregiver, grabbed her and forced her to stay in bed. She begs Tasha not to tell anyone because the niece will lose her job. While updating the chart, Tasha sees that a front-desk employee has typed 'HIV positive' in the patient's scheduling alert after overhearing a hospital nurse; the patient has not authorized disclosure. Separately, the office's Monday autoclave spore test came back positive. The office manager says the autoclave can keep running until the service technician arrives Thursday because 'the indicator strips still turn brown.' Tasha is asked to see a full schedule and to 'keep it quiet' about the bruising.

1. What must Tasha do about the bruising and the patient's request for secrecy? Identify the report and documentation steps.

Read the worked answer

Tasha should not promise secrecy. Nevada health care providers, including dental professionals, are mandatory reporters of suspected elder abuse. The patient's bruises, statement that the caregiver grabbed her, and the caregiver's control over her living situation create a reasonable suspicion that must be reported. Tasha should make the report promptly to the appropriate Nevada adult protective agency or law enforcement under the office protocol. In the chart, she should record the patient's exact words, the location and appearance of the bruises, and the fact that a report was made, without labeling the niece as guilty. She should tell the patient gently that she is required to report to protect her and that the patient is not in trouble. The patient's request for silence does not override the mandatory reporting duty.

2. How should the HIV note in the scheduling alert be handled? What privacy principles apply?

Read the worked answer

HIV status is sensitive health information and should not appear in a front-desk scheduling alert visible to staff who do not need it for treatment, payment, or operations. Tasha should not delete or alter the original record improperly. She should notify the privacy officer or dentist, have the alert removed from the scheduling screen, and ensure the clinical chart contains only accurate information entered by authorized personnel. The patient's authorization is generally required for disclosure outside treatment, payment, and health care operations, and the office must use the minimum necessary standard. The fact that a hospital nurse mentioned it does not make it appropriate for the front desk to record. Tasha should document the correction as an addendum, not by erasing the original entry, and avoid discussing the status in common areas.

3. What is the correct infection-control response to the positive spore test, and what should Tasha do about the schedule?

Read the worked answer

A positive spore test means the autoclave is not reliably sterilizing. The unit should be removed from service immediately, not run until Thursday. The office should use a backup sterilizer or disposable instruments, retest after repair, and recall or quarantine loads processed since the last negative test. Indicator strips turning brown are not a substitute for biological monitoring. Tasha should not treat patients with instruments from a failed sterilizer. She should tell the dentist or infection-control lead, document the positive result and corrective action, and adjust the schedule until sterile instruments are available. If patients may have been exposed to non-sterile instruments, the office should follow exposure-control and notification policies. 'Keeping it quiet' would compound the breach.