Remote Notarization on a Consumer Video App
Priya is a Nevada notary commissioned through June 30, 2028. She has not registered as an electronic notary with the Secretary of State. A California client emails a grant deed that must be signed by the client's elderly mother, who is in a Los Angeles care facility. Priya schedules a video call on a consumer app, watches the mother sign on camera, asks her to hold her driver's license to the camera, and then Priya signs the PDF with a scanned image of her physical stamp and a typed '/s/ Priya Nair.' She emails the PDF back, prints a paper copy for her own file, and writes the transaction in a notebook. She tells the client, 'This is fully valid in Nevada because I am a Nevada notary and the property is in Nevada.' The lender later questions the certificate because it lists the venue as 'Clark County, Nevada' and the notary's commission expiration as June 30, 2028, but the video call occurred while Priya was at her sister's house in Arizona.
1. May Priya perform this remote notarization as described? Identify every defect.
Read the worked answer
No. Priya has not registered as an electronic notary, so she lacks authority to perform electronic notarization in Nevada. She used a consumer video app rather than an approved electronic notarization system, and she did not use a compliant identity-proofing process. A scanned image of her physical stamp is not a valid electronic seal, and a typed '/s/' signature is not a secure electronic signature. She kept only a notebook, not the required electronic journal. She also appears to have performed the act while physically in Arizona. A Nevada notary's authority is exercised within Nevada, and the venue cannot truthfully be Clark County if she was in Arizona. The signer's location in California may be permissible in a proper remote notarization, but Priya's location and process are not.
2. What must Priya do to lawfully perform electronic and remote notarization in Nevada?
Read the worked answer
Priya must first apply for and obtain registration as an electronic notary from the Secretary of State. She must use an approved electronic notarization system that provides identity proofing, audio-video communication, a tamper-evident electronic seal, and an electronic journal. She must verify the signer's identity using satisfactory evidence and the system's required credential analysis. She must be physically located in Nevada when performing the act, record the actual county of the act, and complete the certificate truthfully. The journal must capture the required details and be retained under Nevada law. If she cannot meet those conditions, she should not offer remote notarization; she can perform a traditional notarization only if the signer appears before her in Nevada and the paper requirements are met.
3. What should be done about the certificate's venue and expiration date, and the notebook journal?
Read the worked answer
The expiration date, June 30, 2028, appears to match Priya's commission, so that entry is not the main problem. The venue is the problem: if Priya was in Arizona, 'Clark County, Nevada' is false and must not be used. A notary's certificate should identify the county where the notarial act actually occurred. Because the act was not lawfully performed, the parties should not rely on the PDF. Priya should withdraw it and, if she becomes a registered electronic notary, redo the act through an approved system. The notebook may be useful as a personal log, but it does not satisfy the electronic journal requirement for electronic notarization. A proper system journal should record the act, and Priya should not backfill or alter records to cover the error.