The 5,800-Hour Applicant With a Felony on His Record
Andre is 23 and has applied to the Nevada Private Investigators Licensing Board for a private investigator license. He reports 5,800 hours of experience: 4,100 hours conducting witness interviews and surveillance for a licensed PI firm; 1,200 hours serving subpoenas and process documents; 300 hours as an insurance claims adjuster; and 200 hours doing "case management" for the same PI firm. At 19 he was convicted of felony theft after taking merchandise from a former employer. He completed probation three years ago, has no pardon, and disclosed the conviction on his application. The Board's investigator schedules an interview and asks for records. Andre wants to know whether his hours are enough, whether the felony ends his application, and what happens if the Board denies him.
1. Does Andre meet the experience requirement? Explain how the Board is likely to count each category.
Read the worked answer
Nevada requires a private investigator applicant to document at least 3 years-typically 6,000 hours-of qualifying investigative experience, not merely payroll hours in a related job. Andre's 4,100 hours with the licensed firm are the strongest category, but they still leave him roughly 1,900 hours short. Process serving (1,200 hours) is a separate license category and is not automatically investigative experience; claims adjusting (300 hours) may involve investigation but must be shown by detailed job duties, not the title; and "case management" (200 hours) sounds administrative unless he can prove he personally conducted interviews, surveillance, or evidence analysis. The Board will want employer verification, dates, duties, and supervision. On these facts, Andre does not meet the experience requirement, and adding non-investigative hours would not cure the deficit.
2. How should the Board treat the felony theft conviction, and what should Andre do about it in the application process?
Read the worked answer
NRS 648.120 sets character and conviction qualifications for licensure; a felony theft conviction is not a minor traffic matter and can be treated as a crime involving moral turpitude. Andre should not hide it-he disclosed it, which is good-but disclosure alone does not make him eligible. He should provide certified court records, proof of completion of sentence and probation, evidence of rehabilitation, and any pardon or restoration of civil rights. The Board will evaluate the nature and recency of the offense, whether it relates to the honesty and trust required of an investigator, and any statutory relief. Because the conviction is only three years old and no pardon is reported, the Board is likely to find a disqualifying character issue unless Nevada law gives it discretion and Andre can make a compelling rehabilitation showing. He should be prepared for denial and not operate while unlicensed.
3. If the Board denies the application after a hearing, what procedural options does Andre have?
Read the worked answer
If the Board denies the application, Andre is entitled to the Board's process-typically notice of the proposed action and an opportunity for an administrative hearing where he can present records and witnesses. He should request the hearing in writing within the deadline stated in the notice, subpoena employment records if needed, and address both the experience deficit and the conviction. After the hearing, the Board issues a written decision; if it is adverse, Andre can seek judicial review in district court under Nevada's Administrative Procedure Act, generally by a timely petition. He should not conduct investigative work for clients in the meantime, because operating without a license is independently actionable. The practical path is to cure the experience shortfall with verifiable investigative hours and, if available, obtain relief from the conviction before reapplying.