Suspected Elder Abuse by a Caregiver With Power of Attorney
Dr. Samuel Okafor has seen Mrs. L, age 74, for eight months at an outpatient clinic. She has mild Alzheimer’s disease and lives with her adult son, who is her unpaid caregiver and has power of attorney for finances. Mrs. L arrives with a 4-cm bruise on her upper arm and a small burn on her wrist. She says she “fell,” then whispers that her son “gets frustrated when the money runs out” and that he has taken her debit card. She has missed three of her last five appointments; the son says transportation is difficult. She asks Dr. Okafor not to tell anyone because she fears being placed in a nursing home. She is alert, oriented to person and place, and does not appear to be in immediate danger. The son is waiting in the lobby.
1. Does this information trigger a mandatory elder-abuse report, and what is the reporting threshold?
Read the worked answer
Yes, it likely does. The threshold is reasonable suspicion, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The combination of an unexplained 4-cm bruise, a burn, a caregiver’s financial control, the client’s statement that the son “gets frustrated when the money runs out,” the missing debit card, and missed appointments is enough to require a report. Nevada’s elder-abuse reporting framework covers physical abuse, neglect, and financial exploitation of older or vulnerable adults by caregivers and others. Dr. Okafor does not need to investigate, confront the son, or wait for a physician to confirm abuse. He should make the report promptly by the method Nevada requires-generally an immediate oral report to the Aging and Disability Services Division or law enforcement, followed by any required written report-and document the facts and the report. If he believes there is immediate danger, law enforcement should be contacted now. The client’s request not to tell anyone does not override the mandatory reporting duty.
2. How should Dr. Okafor handle confidentiality and informed consent with Mrs. L?
Read the worked answer
He should explain, in plain language, that psychologists are required by law to report suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of older or vulnerable adults, and that her safety is the reason. He should not ask permission or promise secrecy. He can tell her what he is required to report, to whom, and what will happen next, unless doing so would increase her danger. He should also address her fear of a nursing home: reporting does not automatically mean placement, and the goal is safety planning and support. He should document that the limits of confidentiality were discussed at intake and again now, and that she objected. If she has decision-making capacity for treatment, her treatment preferences still matter; if her cognition is fluctuating, he should assess capacity and involve appropriate supports. The confidentiality exception is narrow: he should share only the information needed for the report and protective services, not the entire therapy record.
3. What immediate clinical and safety steps should follow the report?
Read the worked answer
Reporting is not the end of the clinical task. Dr. Okafor should assess Mrs. L’s immediate safety, the explanation for the injuries, her ability to manage finances and medications, and whether she can return home safely with the son in the lobby. He should consider a medical evaluation for the burn and bruise and ask whether she feels safe going home. If she is in immediate danger, he should call law enforcement and not let her leave with the son until safety is addressed. He should coordinate with Adult Protective Services, offer resources, and schedule close follow-up. He should also consider whether the son’s behavior reflects caregiver burnout and whether additional supports are needed, while not minimizing the possible exploitation. Documentation should include the injuries, verbatim statements, capacity observations, risk assessment, report time and recipient, and follow-up plan. If the son becomes threatening, clinic security or police should be involved.