Abandonment, Diversion, and the Supplier Left Unpaid
A homeowner signed a $34,000 contract with Sierra Vista Roofing for a tile re-roof and paid $28,500 in deposit and progress payments. Crews worked four days, removed the tile, installed underlayment on roughly 40% of the roof, and stopped. The owner's calls, texts, and emails went unanswered for seven weeks while the roof sat open through two rainstorms, causing about $6,800 in interior damage. The owner later learned that a supplier had delivered $9,300 of underlayment and fasteners to the job and had not been paid, and that Sierra Vista's owner had texted an employee, "we had to use the Henderson money to make payroll on the lake job." The owner filed a Board complaint. The investigator requested the job file, the project bank records, and a written statement; Sierra Vista's qualifying party responded 45 days later with two invoices and no statement. Sierra Vista's license is current.
1. Which violations would the Board likely find, and what evidence proves each element?
Read the worked answer
Abandonment/failure to complete. Element: work stopped without justification and without communication. Evidence: the contract, payment ledger ($28,500 of $34,000), the four-day work history, the seven-week silence, and photographs of the open roof. Abandonment is not just stopping - it is stopping and leaving the owner unable to get performance or a straight answer.
Diversion of funds. Element: money received for one project was used for another. The text message is direct evidence; the project bank records would confirm it. Job-costing is the Board's usual method: compare deposits received per job against payments made for labor and materials on that job.
Failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier. The $9,300 invoice and delivery tickets establish the debt; the risk is that the supplier perfects a lien against the homeowner for work the homeowner already paid for.
Failure to cooperate with the investigation. The 45-day partial response is its own violation. Ignoring an investigator is treated as seriously as the underlying conduct, because it defeats the Board's ability to determine what happened.
2. What sanctions can the Board impose, and how should restitution be calculated?
Read the worked answer
The Board's toolkit includes a citation or formal disciplinary action, administrative fines per violation, suspension or revocation, probation with conditions, a requirement to complete the work or refund money, restitution to the injured parties, and reporting consequences that affect future licensing and bonding. Criminal referral is possible where the facts suggest intent to defraud.
Restitution is not the contract price. It is the injured party's actual loss, calculated from the record:
- Homeowner: amounts paid ($28,500) minus the value of work properly performed and materials actually incorporated. A third-party inspection or cost-to-complete estimate establishes both the offset and the amount needed to finish. Add documented consequential damage ($6,800) if the Board treats it as within the loss.
- Supplier: the $9,300 unpaid balance, if the Board orders payment to avoid a lien against the homeowner.
The contractor's job costing matters here: if the file shows the deposit was spent on the Henderson job, the restitution figure and the diversion finding reinforce each other. If the contractor cannot produce records, the Board may resolve ambiguities against it.
3. Sierra Vista argues the owner was "difficult," demanded changes that were never paid for, and therefore the stoppage was justified. How should the Board treat that defense, and what would the contractor have to show?
Read the worked answer
"Difficult owner" is not a defense; it is a characterization. The Board asks whether the contractor followed the contract's change-order and dispute provisions before stopping work.
To make the defense work, Sierra Vista would need: a written change order or written request for extra work, a documented refusal to pay for that extra work, a written notice that work would be suspended unless the dispute was resolved, and evidence that the owner's conduct actually prevented performance - not merely made the job unpleasant. It would also need to explain the seven weeks of silence, because a contractor with a legitimate dispute still answers the phone, and it would need to account for the $28,500 and the supplier's $9,300.
What the contractor cannot do is take the deposit, spend it elsewhere, stop work, go silent, and later reconstruct a justification. The Board will weigh the contemporaneous record - texts, change orders, notices - over testimony offered after the complaint is filed.