The Marijuana Odor Hotel Room
You are a hotel security officer on the Las Vegas Strip. At 11:40 p.m., housekeeping reports marijuana smoke coming from Room 1215. You knock, and a 28-year-old guest opens the door. You smell marijuana and see a lit joint and a small jar on the desk. You say, "I need to search the room for drugs," and step inside. The guest says, "No, you can't come in," and puts his hand on the door. You continue in, search the nightstand, and find a vape pen and $1,200 in cash. You tell him he is detained for possession and call police. The guest is an adult with no outstanding warrants; the amount in the jar is under one ounce. The hotel has a no-smoking policy and a guest-registration agreement. The front desk manager asks whether security handled the room entry correctly.
1. Did the guest have a right to refuse entry, and did the officer's entry violate that right?
Read the worked answer
Yes. A hotel guest has a privacy interest in the rented room. The hotel may have a right to enter for housekeeping, maintenance, or emergencies under its agreement and Nevada innkeeper law, but a security officer demanding entry to search for drugs is different. The guest expressly refused consent and put his hand on the door. The officer stepped in anyway. A private security officer is not a peace officer and cannot rely on criminal investigative authority to search a room. Without consent, a warrant, or a genuine emergency such as immediate danger to life or property, the entry and search exposed the officer and hotel to trespass, invasion of privacy, and battery claims. The no-smoking policy gives the hotel contractual or civil remedies; it does not create a right to search the guest's belongings.
2. Was the detention for possession lawful under Nevada law?
Read the worked answer
Probably not. Nevada's adult-use cannabis law, NRS 678D, generally allows adults 21 and older to possess small amounts of cannabis in private. The guest is 28 and the amount was under one ounce. Public consumption is restricted, and the hotel can enforce its no-smoking policy, but the officer did not observe a crime that justified a citizen's arrest for possession. The odor and the joint may support a policy violation and a request to stop or leave, not a criminal detention. Detaining him for "possession" without a criminal basis creates false imprisonment risk. If the hotel wanted him removed, the manager should have followed the hotel's eviction procedures, documented the policy violation, and called police only if the guest refused to leave or became disorderly.
3. What should the officer have done at the door and afterward?
Read the worked answer
At the door, the officer should have identified himself, stated the policy concern, and asked the guest to stop smoking or to speak with the manager. He should not have entered after the guest said no unless there was an immediate emergency. He should have documented the odor, the visible joint, and the refusal in a report, preserved any relevant hallway video, and notified the manager. If the hotel decided to evict, the manager should have given the guest a reasonable opportunity to comply with the agreement and, if necessary, called police for a trespass after refusal. The officer should not have searched the nightstand or handled the cash. The correct lesson is that private property status does not erase a guest's privacy rights or create police powers.