Lock-In Refusal on B-Block
At 16:05 on B-block you are the only officer on the gallery; your partner is at the far end of the walkway, out of sight around the corner, escorting two inmates from the shower. Fifty-eight inmates are on the block and the 16:15 standing count is ten minutes out. Inmate Cruz, 24, is standing in his cell doorway refusing to lock in; he is talking loudly about the phone system cutting off his call after four minutes and says he is 'not going anywhere' until a sergeant comes. Six or seven other inmates are still out of their cells in the gallery, and Inmate Sims is laughing and saying 'he's right, the phones are garbage.' Cruz has not raised his hands, has not touched you, and is not holding anything. The cell door is open, the gallery is narrow, and the block intercom is six feet behind you. Your radio is on your belt, and the sergeant is on the far side of the facility.
1. Identify the three highest-priority problems in the first 60 seconds and state what you would do about each, with the reasoning behind the order.
Read the worked answer
Priority 1 - shrink the audience. Seven inmates out of their cells watching a refusal is the actual danger; a lone officer with a crowd is how small refusals become group events. Give one clear, loud instruction to the gallery: 'Lock in now.' Close doors as they comply, and position yourself so you can see both Cruz and the gallery.
Priority 2 - contain Cruz without touching him. Stand at a distance that gives you reaction time, keep the doorway in view, and do not let him walk past you into the gallery. There is no weapon, no threat, and no attempt to leave the block, so a solo physical intervention is neither justified nor prudent; it would likely convert a verbal refusal into a fight with seven spectators.
Priority 3 - get an officer and a supervisor on scene. Key the radio and be specific: 'B-block, one inmate refusing lock-in, approximately seven inmates still out, requesting assistance.' Specificity is what produces a fast response; 'I need help' does not.
The count deadline is real but subordinate. A count taken with inmates out of place and an officer engaged is a bad count. Report the delay to the supervisor rather than reporting a count you could not actually verify - a false 'clear' is worse than a late one.
2. Cruz says he will lock in if you promise the sergeant will fix his phone account and 'get the money back.' How do you respond? Give the words you would use and explain the principle.
Read the worked answer
Principle: never trade compliance for a promise you cannot personally keep. Cruz is asking you to guarantee an outcome that belongs to the phone vendor, the business office, and the sergeant - not to you. If you promise and it does not happen, you have taught him that your word is worthless and given him a reason to refuse again.
Say something close to: 'I can't promise what the phone company will do or that you'll get money back - that isn't mine to give. What I can do is make sure the sergeant hears the complaint tonight and that you get a grievance form. Right now I need you to lock in so I can do the count and then go get him.'
What that does: it treats the complaint as legitimate enough to route, it is honest about the limits of your authority, it separates the grievance from the order, and it gives him a face-saving path. It also avoids the two failure modes - bargaining ('lock in and I'll get your money back') and dismissing ('the phones are fine, lock in').
Do not offer reduced consequences, extra phone time, or a favor in exchange for compliance. That is outside your authority and creates a precedent the next officer will inherit.
Follow through. If you say you will tell the sergeant and get a grievance form, do it that shift and note it. The next refusal on that gallery will be settled by whether you kept your word this time.
3. The sergeant arrives at 16:14 and Cruz locks in at 16:16; count begins 16:20 and clears at 16:24. What must be documented and by whom, and what would have triggered a use-of-force report here?
Read the worked answer
Document (unusual incident report plus block log entry): the times - refusal begins about 1605, supervisor requested, supervisor on scene 1614, Cruz locks in 1616, count initiated 1620, count clear 1624. Record Cruz's statements as close to verbatim as you can ('not going anywhere until a sergeant comes'), the number of inmates out of their cells at the start and when the gallery was cleared, Inmate Sims's comments, who was present, and what you said. Record that no physical contact occurred.
Who: you write the report as the observing officer; your partner writes a separate statement if they saw any part of it; the sergeant writes their own account and endorses the log. Do not write 'the sergeant will handle it' in place of your own report.
No use-of-force report is required here, and none should be manufactured - no hands-on, no restraints, no cell extraction. Force reporting is triggered by physical contact, application of restraints, chemical spray, or a baton. Had any of that occurred, you would need the force report, a medical evaluation, photographs, and the notification chain, the same shift.
Two things not to skip: the count times must be recorded as they actually occurred, not adjusted to look on time; and Cruz's phone complaint should be forwarded as a grievance so the underlying issue is handled through a documented channel rather than the next refusal.