Wage Slavery or Opportunity? A Massachusetts Mill Report, 1885
Fall River, Massachusetts, 1885. A state bureau of statistics of labor investigates a cotton mill employing 1,300 operatives: 60 percent women, 14 percent children under 16, a 60-hour week, and daily wages of $1.05 for weavers and 60 cents for doffers. The company rents tenements at $3.50 a month and pays wages partly in scrip redeemable at its own store. The town has a graded school, a library endowed by the mill's owners, and a savings bank where operatives hold $210,000 in deposits. Twenty-two percent of operatives have been in the mill less than a year; the owner testifies that half his workforce is "transient, and no law can make them thrifty." A bill in the legislature would bar employment under 14 and limit the day to ten hours.
1. Using the data, assess the claim that mill operatives are "wage slaves." Which figures support the claim and which undercut it?
Read the worked answer
Supporting: $1.05 a day for a 60-hour week is about $6.30 a week, against $3.50 rent - roughly half of one earner's pay goes back to the company as housing. Scrip at the company store removes the choice of where to spend wages. Fourteen percent children under 16 suggests adult wages alone will not keep a family.
Undercutting: operatives are not legally bound to the job. Turnover of 22 percent in a year means people leave, which a chattel slave cannot do. Savings deposits of $210,000 show accumulation is possible for at least some households, and the school and library are real benefits, however paternal.
The sound judgment: dependence is genuine but is not slavery. The operative can quit, though quitting forfeits the tenement - which is exactly where legislation can bite. "Compelled by contract and housing" describes the condition better than "slavery," and the difference matters for whether law can remedy it.
2. The owner invokes liberty of contract and property; supporters of the bill invoke the police power. Which doctrine better fits the facts, and what facts would shift your answer?
Read the worked answer
Liberty of contract assumes a bargain between equals. The data show the mill sets wages, sets rent, and runs the only store. A bargain with one author is not much of a bargain, so the police power - the state's authority to protect health, safety, and morals - fits the facts better.
It fits unevenly, though. A 60-hour week for a fourteen-year-old is a clear health question, because a child's consent has no legal weight. A ten-hour limit for an adult woman or man is a closer call in 1885.
Facts that would shift the balance: evidence that long hours produced measurable injury or accident rates; evidence that operatives bargained collectively and chose these terms, which would weaken the case for regulation; or evidence that the mill was one of several competing employers, which would make quitting a real alternative rather than a threat.
3. Predict how a court in 1885 would likely rule on this bill, how a court in 1910 might rule, and explain what changed.
Read the worked answer
1885: a court would likely uphold the child-labor provision narrowly and strike the ten-hour limit for adults, reasoning that adult hours are matters of contract the legislature may not rewrite. That is the pattern of the era's hours cases.
1910: the same law would likely survive. Courts had begun asking whether hours regulation was a reasonable exercise of the police power, and a factual record - bureau reports, factory inspection data, accident statistics - gave them a basis for saying yes.
What changed was not the Constitution but the record and the test. Liberty of contract moved from a near-absolute to one interest to be balanced. This is the practical lesson for the bureau: its statistics are not neutral description. The report the legislators are writing is the evidence a later court will cite, which is why how the bureau frames the numbers matters as much as the numbers.