Body Camera Gap and the FOIL Request
You arrest a 22-year-old man for obstructing governmental administration after a noise complaint at a crowded sidewalk. Your report says the man pulled away, causing both of you to fall. During booking, you review your body-worn camera footage and see a four-second gap. In the missing seconds, the man says, I cannot breathe, and your hand is on his upper back as he is face-down. The arrest report does not mention that statement or the hand position. Your supervisor tells you to keep the report simple and just say he resisted. Three days later, a journalist files a public-records request for the incident report and the body-worn camera video. The department has five business days to acknowledge the request. The arrest is still pending.
1. How should you correct or supplement the report after viewing the body-camera gap?
Read the worked answer
Do not rewrite the original report to make it look as though the missing detail was always there. Instead, prepare a supplemental report that identifies the date and time you reviewed the footage, what the original report omitted, and the observed facts in neutral language. Include the man's exact words, the hand position, the duration of the gap, and what happened immediately before and after. If the original report contains an error, say so directly and explain the correction. The goal is accuracy, not a cleaner narrative.
A supplemental report is also the place to explain why the omission occurred, if you know: for example, you wrote the report before reviewing the footage. Do not speculate about the cause. Attach or reference the video by evidence number. If the original report is a sworn document, follow agency procedure for correcting a sworn statement; do not alter the original without documenting the change. The supplement should be written so a prosecutor, a defense attorney, and a supervisor can see exactly what changed and why. That transparency protects the case more than a polished but incomplete report.
2. The supervisor instructs you to keep the report simple and just say he resisted. How do you respond, and what do you write?
Read the worked answer
You cannot write a statement you know is incomplete or misleading. Resist the instruction respectfully and in the moment: explain that the video contains a statement about not being able to breathe and a hand position that the report does not mention, and that omitting them could damage the case and your credibility. If the supervisor persists, ask for the instruction in writing or raise it with a higher supervisor or the agency's legal advisor. Do not argue in front of the arrestee.
In the report, describe the resistance with observable facts: what the man did with his body, what you said, what you did, and how long it lasted. Do not use the label resisted as a substitute for the conduct. Include his statement and your response, including whether you checked on his breathing or repositioned him. If you applied pressure to his back, describe the duration and any medical follow-up. If you did not check on him, say so rather than implying you did. The report should be complete enough to withstand cross-examination and consistent with the video. A short truthful report is better than a simple false one.
3. How do you process the public-records request for the report and the body-worn camera video while the case is pending?
Read the worked answer
Acknowledge the request in writing within five business days, as New York law requires, and set a reasonable date for a determination. Do not ignore the request because the case is pending. Review the records with the agency's records officer and legal counsel. The incident report is generally disclosable under FOIL, but some portions may be withheld or redacted if a specific exemption applies, such as personal privacy, confidential informant information, or material that would interfere with an active investigation. The pending prosecution does not automatically make the entire file exempt; the agency must identify and justify each withholding.
For the body-worn camera video, consider privacy redactions for bystanders and the arrestee, but do not redact the four-second gap or the statement about breathing. If the video is evidence in a pending case, consult the prosecutor about a litigation hold and disclosure obligations. Keep a log of what was reviewed, what was withheld, and the legal basis. If the request is denied in whole or part, issue a written denial that cites the exemption and explains the appeal rights. The goal is to avoid both an unlawful blanket denial and an unredacted release that harms a legitimate privacy or investigative interest.