Too Few Words at Three: Evaluating a Language-Deprived Preschooler
Rosa is two years and ten months old with profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Her hearing parents speak Spanish at home and chose a spoken-language approach; Rosa received cochlear implants at 18 months but has only 12 consistently used spoken words and no sign vocabulary. The early intervention provider used a listening-and-spoken-language curriculum with weekly home visits. Rosa turns three in six weeks, and the district must convene an initial CPSE meeting. The parents bring a private speech-language report recommending continued oral-only placement and ask that American Sign Language be excluded because it will confuse her. A developmental evaluation conducted in Spanish by a bilingual examiner shows age-appropriate cognitive skills; no evaluation has been done in a visual language or with a sign-fluent examiner. The CPSE chair asks you, the district DHH teacher, to summarize what the team needs before it writes the IEP.
1. What is wrong with the evaluation, and what must happen before the CPSE meeting?
Read the worked answer
The evaluation as it stands cannot answer the CPSE's central question, which is how Rosa communicates and learns, not merely how she performs in Spanish. A bilingual examiner controlled for language of testing but not for mode: Rosa has almost no spoken language and no sign language, so her language scores will reflect deprivation, not ability. The team needs (1) an assessment by a teacher of the Deaf or DHH specialist in visual language and play; (2) a communication assessment that samples gesture, sign, vocalization, and aided listening; (3) current audiology and CI mapping data, including aided thresholds; (4) a sign-fluent or ASL/Spanish/English interpreter for any testing; and (5) a parent interview in Spanish about home communication. Without this, the team risks writing cognitive delay or language disorder into an IEP when the actual finding is lack of accessible language. Evaluation in the child's language and mode is an IDEA requirement, not a courtesy.
2. The parents refuse ASL. How do you respond without overriding them?
Read the worked answer
Do not override the parents; do not agree to a plan the data do not support. Start by acknowledging their goal: they want Rosa to speak, and that is legitimate. Then share the specific number: 12 words at nearly three, after more than a year of implant use, is not a plateau the team can wait out without changing something. Explain that ASL does not displace spoken language; it gives a language foundation and reduces the risk of language deprivation, and children can use both. Offer evidence and access: a visit to a DHH preschool, a meeting with Deaf adults and with parents who chose bilingual programming, and a trial period with clear progress monitoring. Clarify that the district must offer a full continuum including ASL/English options but cannot require ASL against the parents' wishes. Document the conversation and the agreed review dates. If spoken language accelerates, revisit; if not, the data will make the decision clearer than an argument.
3. What placement and service options should the team consider, and how should LRE be applied?
Read the worked answer
LRE is not a single rung on a ladder; it is the setting where Rosa can access language and make progress alongside peers without disabilities, to the maximum extent appropriate. For a child with limited language and a short window before kindergarten, a language-rich DHH preschool with signing peers may be the placement that makes later inclusion possible, not a violation of LRE. The team should compare at least three options: (a) general education preschool with a DHH teacher, interpreter, and consult; (b) a DHH special class with reverse-inclusion time; (c) a bilingual ASL/English class. For each, ask who will model language all day, how Rosa's Spanish will be maintained, how progress will be measured monthly, and what transportation and family communication are needed. Build a blended schedule if possible and set a six-month review. The IEP must specify services, not just a room.