The 504 That Stopped Working
Devon is a fifth grader with a Section 504 plan for ADHD written two years ago. It provides extended time on tests and preferential seating. This year he has not completed four of the last six math assignments, has three office referrals for calling out during independent work, and his reading comprehension falls about 1.5 grade levels below grade level. He avoids reading aloud and guesses at multi-syllable words. His mother emails: "The 504 isn't working. I want an IEP." At a grade-level meeting a colleague says, "He isn't failing any classes, so he won't qualify - 504 is enough." You have two weeks of your own running records showing he reads 38 words correct per minute on grade-level text with 6 errors.
1. What are the school's obligations once Devon's mother requests an IEP evaluation, and what is wrong with the colleague's reasoning?
Read the worked answer
The mother's email is a request for evaluation, and it triggers a process that the team does not get to skip.
- Child Find. The district has an affirmative duty to identify students who may need special education, and a parent request is a formal signal that must be handled according to the state's timeline - written notice, consent for evaluation, and completion of the evaluation within the required period.
- The colleague's standard is wrong. "Not failing" is not the eligibility test. The question is whether a disability adversely affects educational performance and whether the student needs specially designed instruction that cannot be provided through general education alone. A student can pass with extensive support and still be eligible.
- The 504 is evidence. A plan that no longer addresses the problem is exactly the kind of data that supports looking at a different level of service.
I would not tell the parent "he won't qualify," and I would not let the meeting drift into that assumption. I would make sure procedural safeguards and prior written notice go to the family in writing.
2. What data should the team gather before an eligibility meeting, and what would you contribute?
Read the worked answer
The evaluation needs to describe what Devon can do, under what conditions, and whether the gap persists despite intervention.
- My own data: the running records and error analysis - he is guessing at multi-syllable words, which suggests a decoding need, not just attention. Also work samples showing incomplete vs. completed work and the pattern across the week.
- Interventions tried: what I adjusted, for how long, with what measurement, and the slope of his progress. A flat line across a genuine intervention is powerful evidence.
- Behavior data: the three office referrals and what preceded them. Are the call-outs happening when reading demands spike? That distinction matters.
- Classroom observation by someone other than me, plus attendance records, vision and hearing screening, and any prior testing.
- Parent input about homework, medication, and what they see at home.
I would bring a one-page summary that a team can read in three minutes, and I would be honest about anything that undermines my own hypothesis.
3. Distinguish what a 504 plan can provide from what an IEP would add in this case.
Read the worked answer
Both are plans under federal law, but they are not interchangeable tiers of the same thing.
- A 504 plan provides accommodations that give a student with a disability equal access to the general program: extra time, preferential seating, reduced-distraction setting, breaks. It does not provide instruction.
- An IEP provides specially designed instruction, measurable annual goals, related services, and documented progress reporting. It is built on an evaluation and answerable to the question "what will we teach, and how will we know it worked?"
Applied to Devon: extended time and seating were reasonable bets two years ago. But he now shows a decoding and fluency gap that accommodation alone cannot close. If the evaluation confirms a specific learning disability, the answer is not more time on the same worksheet - it is structured reading instruction with goals and progress monitoring. If the evaluation shows attention is the sole driver and instruction is not needed, the 504 could be revised instead. The data decides, not the label the parent prefers.