Just a Language Issue
You teach second grade. Sofía has been in U.S. schools for two years. Her home language is Spanish, she is at an emerging level on the English proficiency assessment, and she receives ENL push-in services three times a week. She is not meeting grade-level benchmarks in reading in English or in Spanish. Her Spanish-speaking tutor reports that after a year of intervention she still cannot reliably segment or blend syllables in Spanish. Attendance is 92 percent. Last year's teacher wrote in her file, "Give her time - it's just a language issue." Her current classroom teacher says the same and resists making a referral. You have twelve weeks of your own small-group data, twenty minutes per week, showing minimal growth relative to her group.
1. How would you reason about whether Sofía's difficulties reflect second-language acquisition or a disability?
Read the worked answer
The single most informative fact here is the tutor's report: the difficulty is present in Spanish, her stronger language, after a year of intervention. Language acquisition alone does not produce persistent phonological difficulty in a child's first language.
I would work through the exclusionary factors systematically:
- Native language evidence. Struggles in Spanish in phonological awareness point toward a processing issue rather than a second-language effect. If she were only struggling in English, my first hypothesis would be language.
- Rate of growth, not just level. Twelve weeks of small-group data with a flat slope, compared with similar peers, is more meaningful than a single benchmark score.
- Opportunity to learn. 92 percent attendance is not perfect; I would check which specific days and lessons she missed and whether the absences align with the skills she lacks.
- Sensory and health: vision and hearing screening, any history of ear infections.
- Instructional history: has she had systematic, explicit phonics instruction in either language, or only exposure?
The teacher's "give her time" is a hypothesis, not a conclusion. Two years in with flat progress in both languages is enough to test it.
2. The team wants to wait another year before evaluating. What is your response, and what process applies?
Read the worked answer
Waiting is not a neutral choice; it is a decision to withhold intervention during the window when reading difficulties are most remediable.
- Language difference cannot be used as a reason to delay. Federal law specifically prohibits identifying or failing to identify a child as having a disability based on limited English proficiency. "It's just language" is precisely the reasoning that is disallowed when it becomes a blanket refusal to look.
- Child Find applies. A student suspected of having a disability must be referred and evaluated within the state's timeline, with written notice and consent, and with parents informed in a language they understand.
- The evaluation must be nondiscriminatory: administered in the language most likely to yield accurate information, by personnel trained to distinguish language difference from disability, using multiple measures rather than a single test score.
- Waiting carries risk. A full year of continued non-response increases the gap and makes intervention harder later.
What I would ask for is not a label but an evaluation, and I would say so plainly in the team meeting with my data in hand.
3. What data and documentation would you bring to the team?
Read the worked answer
The meeting will turn on evidence, and I want the evidence to be specific enough that no one can wave it away as "just language."
- My twelve weeks of small-group data: what skill I targeted, what I did, the frequency, and the slope of her growth against the comparison group - presented as a simple line graph, not a paragraph.
- Work samples across both languages, with dates, showing the same error pattern in Spanish and English.
- The tutor's report in writing, with the specific tasks she cannot do after a year.
- The prior teacher's note, because it establishes that the concern is not new and that the response so far has been to wait.
- Attendance records and the specific lessons missed, plus vision and hearing screening dates.
- Benchmark scores in both languages and English proficiency scores with an interpretation of what they do and do not measure.
- Parent input, gathered in Spanish, about what the family observes at home and in Spanish literacy.
I would also write down what would change my mind - for example, a steep recent acceleration - so the team sees I am testing a hypothesis rather than advocating a conclusion.