The Politically Exposed Person Next Door
A wealth management firm is onboarding a customer who is a New Zealand resident and has lived here for 20 years. He is a retired former minister of finance of a small Pacific island nation, having left office 12 years ago. He wishes to invest NZ$1.5 million from an offshore account. His son, who is a current member of that country's parliament, is also a signatory on the investing entity. The relationship manager argues that because the customer has lived in NZ for two decades and left office long ago, he is 'no longer a PEP' and standard CDD applies. The customer has provided a passport and a rates notice. The offshore account is in a jurisdiction the firm rates as higher risk.
1. Is the customer a politically exposed person, and does the passage of time or NZ residency remove that status?
Read the worked answer
PEP status. A PEP is an individual who holds, or has held, a prominent public function - heads of state, ministers, senior officials, and similar - including former holders of such functions. The customer was a minister of finance, which is squarely within the definition. The son, as a current MP, is also a PEP.
Does time or residency remove it?
- Residency in New Zealand does not remove PEP status. The definition attaches to the function held, not to where the person now lives.
- Time since leaving office is a risk factor, not an automatic erasure. The firm should treat former PEPs as continuing to present higher risk for a period, and the fact that he left office 12 years ago may reduce - but does not eliminate - the risk. The firm must apply a risk-based approach and document its reasoning; it cannot simply declare him 'no longer a PEP'.
- The son as current MP and signatory is a separate and current PEP connection that must be assessed.
Conclusion: enhanced CDD applies. Standard CDD is not sufficient.
2. What enhanced CDD measures are required, and what governance approvals and ongoing obligations apply?
Read the worked answer
Enhanced CDD:
- Establish source of wealth and source of funds for the NZ$1.5m with independent, reliable evidence - not just a passport and rates notice.
- Establish the source of the offshore funds and the reason for the offshore account, given the higher-risk jurisdiction.
- Identify and verify all beneficial owners of the investing entity, including the son and any other controllers.
- Adverse media and sanctions screening on both the former minister and the current MP, covering their public functions and any allegations.
- Understand the purpose and intended nature of the relationship.
Governance:
- Senior management approval is required before establishing (or continuing) a relationship with a PEP.
- Document the risk assessment and the approval decision.
Ongoing obligations:
- Enhanced ongoing monitoring of the relationship and transactions.
- Periodic review of PEP status and risk rating.
- If any activity appears suspicious, a SAR should be considered, with the usual tipping-off prohibition.
The relationship manager's 'he's been here 20 years' argument is a risk-factor observation, not a basis to downgrade to standard CDD.