CAA NZ CPL Aircraft Technical Knowledge study materials
CAA NZ CPL Aircraft Technical Knowledge study resources

Aft CG and Marginal Grass-Runway Takeoff

CAA NZ CPL Aircraft Technical Knowledge · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Aft CG and Marginal Grass-Runway Takeoff

An aeroplane has MTOW 1,150 kg, empty mass 700 kg, empty CG 0.78 m aft of datum, CG limits 0.75–1.05 m aft of datum. Arms: pilot and front passenger 0.85 m, rear passengers 1.75 m, baggage 2.20 m, fuel 1.00 m. Fuel density 0.72 kg/L. Load: pilot 85 kg, front passenger 80 kg, two rear passengers 75 kg each, baggage 20 kg, fuel 140 L. The planned departure runway is 620 m dry grass, elevation 1,400 ft, OAT 22°C, wind calm. POH sea-level ISA ground roll is 285 m; add 10% per 1,000 ft of density altitude and 15% for dry grass; takeoff over 50 ft is 1.6 times ground roll. The aircraft has no performance-enhancing modifications. The pilot plans a no-flap takeoff.

1. Calculate the total mass and CG. Is the loading within limits?

Read the worked answer

Mass: empty 700 + pilot 85 + front 80 + rear 150 + baggage 20 + fuel (140 × 0.72 = 100.8) = 1,135.8 kg. Moment: 700×0.78 = 546.0; 165×0.85 = 140.25; 150×1.75 = 262.5; 20×2.20 = 44.0; 100.8×1.00 = 100.8; total = 1,093.55 kg·m. CG = 1,093.55/1,135.8 = 0.963 m aft of datum. The CG limit is 0.75–1.05 m, so it is within limits but only 0.087 m forward of the aft limit. Mass is 14.2 kg below MTOW. The loading is legal but has little aft-CG margin, which reduces static stability and can increase rotation tendency.

2. Calculate density altitude and the takeoff distance over 50 ft. Does the runway provide an acceptable margin?

Read the worked answer

Pressure altitude 1,400 ft. ISA temperature = 15 − 2×1.4 = 12.2°C; OAT 22°C is ISA+9.8°C. Density altitude ≈ 1,400 + 120×9.8 = 2,576 ft. Ground-roll factor: 1 + 0.10×(2.576) = 1.258 for altitude, and 1.15 for dry grass, so 285×1.258×1.15 = 412 m. Takeoff over 50 ft = 1.6×412 = 659 m. The runway is 620 m, so the calculated 50-ft distance exceeds the available runway by about 39 m. With no wind and a near-aft CG, this is not an acceptable margin.

3. What operational changes would you make, and why does moving the CG forward matter?

Read the worked answer

Reduce mass and move the CG forward: offload baggage or a rear passenger, reduce fuel to the planned trip plus reserve, and use a longer or sealed runway. Waiting for a cooler time of day lowers density altitude; a headwind helps but cannot be assumed. A near-aft CG reduces pitch stability and can make the aircraft rotate more easily, but it does not fix the runway margin. Recompute after changes; the takeoff should have a clear margin over the 50-ft distance, not just equal it. If no combination gives that margin, delay or change departure airport.