NZ CFS L5 General Insurance study materials
NZ CFS L5 General Insurance study resources

NZ CFS L5 General Insurance: Client information gathering, needs analysis and the advice process

NZ CFS L5 General Insurance · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Client information gathering, needs analysis and the advice process

What this domain tests

The advice process under the Financial Advice Code: how to gather client information, identify needs, test suitability and document advice so the client understands it.

The process

  • Scope and engagement. Agree what is being advised on and what is excluded.
  • Information gathering. Collect financial position, goals, dependants, existing cover, risk tolerance, health and occupation where relevant.
  • Needs analysis. Quantify the risk: rebuild cost, contents value, liability exposure, income replacement, business interruption and debts.
  • Research and suitability. Compare options on cover, terms, exclusions, excesses, insurer strength and premium, not premium alone.
  • Presentation and understanding. Explain the recommendation, alternatives, costs and consequences in plain language and check comprehension.
  • Disclosure. Fees, commissions, conflicts and any limitations.
  • Implementation and review. Place cover, confirm it, diarise review.

Code standards

Suitability (Standard 3) and client understanding (Standard 4) are central; record-keeping supports both. There is no single prescribed statement-of-advice format, but the file must show the basis for the recommendation.

Worked example

A couple with an $800,000 mortgage and two young children have life cover only. The adviser identifies a need for income protection and house cover. The house sum insured is calculated on rebuild cost, not market value. The adviser recommends a policy with a longer wait period to keep premiums affordable, explains the trade-off, records the client's acceptance and discloses commission.

Traps

  • Collecting facts without analysing needs.
  • Recommending the cheapest premium rather than suitable cover.
  • Failing to document limitations or the client's decisions.
  • Assuming existing cover is adequate without checking sums insured and definitions.