A long-serving volunteer, a new recruit, and a driver shortage
You are the chief fire officer of a volunteer brigade of 14, with a minimum responding strength of 8. Dean, a 15-year member, is the brigade's only Class 2 driver for the tanker and has a strong operational record, but he habitually mocks newer members. At the last three Wednesday trainings he has called Aroha, an 18-year-old recruit of three months, 'the school kid' and questioned aloud whether she could 'lift a branch, let alone a hose'. Two other members laughed; one later told you Aroha cried in the shed afterwards. Aroha has told a friend she is thinking about quitting. When you raised it informally, Dean said: 'That is just how we talk. She needs to harden up, we are not a kindergarten.' The district is entering a high fire-danger period and the brigade is already at minimum strength for daytime callouts. Aroha is otherwise progressing well and passed her basic skills assessment first time.
1. What do you do in the next 48 hours?
Read the worked answer
Separate the two things that need doing: the welfare of the recruit, and the conduct of the member.
With Aroha, within a day or two, privately and away from the station: acknowledge what you have been told, thank her for it being raised, and do not ask her to manage the situation herself or promise an outcome you cannot guarantee. Ask what she needs - a mentor, a changed seating arrangement, a break from Dean's crew for a short period - and tell her what will happen next, including who else will know. Follow up in a week rather than assuming it is fixed.
With Dean, a formal, specific conversation rather than another informal word. Name the behaviour with dates and words used, state the standard expected of every member, and state the impact: a recruit is considering leaving and others saw the behaviour go unchallenged. Record the conversation and the date. Tell him it is a conduct matter, not banter, and what happens if it continues.
Also address the onlookers - the two who laughed learned that this is tolerated. Do not move or penalise Aroha to solve the problem.
2. How do you handle the fact that Dean is the only Class 2 tanker driver?
Read the worked answer
The driver shortage is a resilience problem, not a reason to soften the conduct process. If the two get tangled together, Dean effectively holds a veto over how he is allowed to behave, and the brigade learns that technical value buys immunity.
Handle them separately and in parallel:
- Continue the conduct process on its own merits, with the regional or people-and-culture advisor involved if it escalates. Consult the code of conduct before deciding any outcome so the process is defensible if Dean challenges it.
- At the same time, fix the single point of failure: identify two members for Class 2 training and tanker driver assessment now, book the courses, and record it as a brigade risk in your report. This should have been done before it became a crisis.
- Cover the short term operationally: mutual aid from a neighbouring brigade, paid staff for known high-risk days, or a written temporary arrangement - not silence about the behaviour.
A useful test: if Dean resigned tomorrow, the brigade would have a driver problem that you must already have a plan for. Build the plan before you need it, and do not let it delay the response to Aroha.
3. Dean resigns and there is no qualified tanker driver for the coming week. What do you decide and how do you communicate it?
Read the worked answer
Accept that this is a genuine operational risk and manage it transparently rather than reversing course or quietly letting the issue drop.
Decision: for the next seven days, any incident requiring the tanker is responded to by the neighbouring brigade's appliance or by a paid crew, with your brigade attending in support. Notify ComCen in writing of the reduced capability so dispatch is not built on an assumption that is no longer true. Tell the brigade honestly at the next training: the tanker is unavailable for a week, this is why, and this is the cover arrangement.
Communication discipline matters here. Do not discuss Dean's conduct with the crew - say that a personnel matter has been dealt with and leave it there. Do not blame Aroha, and do not let a rumour that she 'caused' the resignation take hold; a short factual statement about standards of behaviour being the same for everyone closes that gap.
Then follow through: driver training booked, a review date, and a note in your report that single-driver dependency was the underlying risk.