Declining induction at 41 weeks: informed choice with whānau
A 34-year-old Māori woman, para 1, is 41+0 weeks pregnant and has had an uncomplicated pregnancy. Her LMC is based in a town 30 minutes from the tertiary hospital. At today’s visit the cervix is 2 cm long, closed and posterior; the fetal heart is normal and the baby is growing appropriately. She declines a membrane sweep and induction of labour, saying she wants to wait until 42 weeks and that her kaumātua has advised her to let the baby come when ready. She plans a water birth and wants her whānau present. She has read about the risks of going overdue and is worried about being pressured. She has no transport of her own and relies on a friend for hospital visits. She asks what will happen if she continues to decline induction. She is tearful and says she feels judged by the hospital team.
1. How would you discuss the risks and benefits of induction versus expectant management at 41 weeks in a way that supports informed choice?
Read the worked answer
I would first acknowledge her worry about pressure and ask what she already understands. I would explain that at 41 weeks the pregnancy is still low risk, but that the chance of stillbirth and other complications rises gradually after 41 weeks, and that induction is offered because it reduces those risks compared with waiting. I would also be honest about the harms and burdens of induction: longer labour, stronger contractions, epidural use, instrumental birth, caesarean section, failed induction, and separation from her planned water birth and whānau.
I would avoid presenting induction as the only safe choice. I would say that expectant management with increased monitoring is a legitimate option, but that the risk of waiting needs to be balanced against the risk of intervention. I would use absolute numbers where possible and check her understanding. I would ask what matters most to her: avoiding intervention, having whānau present, water birth, or avoiding a hospital stay.
I would make clear that the decision is hers and that I will continue to care for her either way. I would document the discussion, the options, her questions, her values and her decision, and I would not use language that implies she is failing her baby.
2. What culturally safe and Te Tiriti-based actions would you take, including whānau involvement and equity of access?
Read the worked answer
I would begin by acknowledging her as Māori and asking how she wants her culture and whānau included, rather than assuming. I would ask whether she wants her kaumātua, partner or other whānau involved in discussions, and whether a Māori midwife, kaiāwhina or interpreter would help. I would use a mihi and plain language, and I would avoid treating her decision as a deviation from a hospital norm.
Te Tiriti-based practice means actively addressing power imbalances and access barriers. Her lack of transport is a concrete equity issue: I would organise transport, parking, childcare or travel support so that monitoring and any transfer are not made harder by cost or distance. I would advocate for her with the hospital team if she feels judged and ask that her whānau and birth preferences be respected.
I would document her cultural preferences, who she wants involved, the equity actions taken, and her informed decision in her own words where possible. Cultural safety is not a single question at booking; it is how I behave when she disagrees with me.
3. If she continues to decline induction, what monitoring and documentation plan would you put in place?
Read the worked answer
I would escalate to the obstetric team for a shared plan rather than manage alone. I would arrange regular CTG monitoring, fetal growth and liquor volume assessment, and blood pressure checks according to local guidance, with clear dates. I would ask her to monitor fetal movements daily and contact urgently if movements reduce. I would provide a written safety-net plan: bleeding, fluid loss, contractions, headache, visual changes, reduced movements, or any concern means immediate phone contact and review.
I would discuss a time limit: she wants to wait until 42 weeks, so I would clarify what happens at 42 weeks and what monitoring is available if she still declines. I would document the risks explained, her capacity, her informed refusal, the monitoring plan, the escalation pathway, and who else was involved. I would also document her birth preferences and whānau involvement. If there is any sign of fetal compromise or maternal deterioration, the plan changes to urgent assessment and transfer. The aim is to respect her autonomy while keeping her safe and connected to care.