Captioning a Hula Video: Language, Permission and Online Safety
Your Year 11 Cook Islands Māori class filmed a 45-second hula at the school festival. The dancers have signed consent, but the drummer and the teacher who composed the pe‘e have not. You want to post it on the school’s public Instagram (1,200 followers, mostly students and parents). You must write a bilingual caption. A classmate wants “Kia orana” without a macron because “it gets more likes”; another wants to paste the full pe‘e text. The composer is away for a week. The drummer’s family has asked to see the video before it goes online. The school’s online safety policy says unapproved content must be taken down within 48 hours. The footage includes a close-up of a dancer’s tattoo. You have 48 hours before the class publishes its end-of-term post.
1. What language choices would you make for the caption, and why?
Read the worked answer
I would write a short bilingual caption with the Cook Islands Māori line first and an English line second. I would use standard orthography, including macrons and glottal stops, because “Kia orana” without the macron is not more correct just because it may get more likes; likes are not evidence about spelling. I would name the occasion and the class, but I would not paste the full pe‘e text without the composer’s permission, because a pe‘e may be owned by a family or composer and may carry protocols. I would use one sentence to explain what the hula is for learners, and I would avoid claiming that the caption represents the whole tradition. The reasoning is that a public caption teaches language and culture at the same time, so accuracy and permission matter more than engagement.
2. How do the missing permissions and the close-up of the tattoo affect what you can publish?
Read the worked answer
The dancers’ consent covers only the dancers. The drummer and the composer have rights and relationships in the performance, so I would pause publication until the drummer’s family has seen the video and the composer has been contacted. The tattoo close-up is a separate cultural-safety issue: it may be personal or tapu, and a public caption should not explain or expose it without permission. I would ask the dancers whether the shot can be cropped or blurred, and I would not add commentary about the tattoo. I would document who consented and when, because the school policy requires approved content. The reasoning is that consent is not a single signature; it is a set of relationships, and the safest default is to publish less rather than more.
3. If the composer cannot be reached within 48 hours, what should the class do?
Read the worked answer
I would not publish the video with the pe‘e audio just to meet the end-of-term deadline. I would explain the delay to the class and the teacher, ask whether a different clip with cleared permissions can be used, or post a text-and-still-image version that does not include the pe‘e or the tattoo close-up. If the drummer’s family approves but the composer does not, the audio may still need to be muted or replaced. I would record the decision and the reasons so that the class can revisit it later. The reasoning is that the 48-hour takedown policy is a safety net, not a licence to publish first and ask later; cultural permission and the school’s reputation are more important than a deadline.