The welcome speech that sounds like a group chat
Manu, a Year 11 student, has two days to prepare a 90-second welcome speech in Vagahau Niue for a school assembly. The guests are twelve people visiting from Niue, including two elders and the leader of the group. Manu learned most of his Niuean at home in Auckland, in short conversational exchanges with his mother. His draft opens with 'Hi everybody', greets the group with 'Fakaalofa atu ki a koe' (the singular form he uses with one person at a time), repeats 'mitaki' four times, mixes in 'yeah' and 'so', and ends with 'see you'. Several sentences follow English word order, translating 'we are very happy to have you here' almost word for word. He plans to hold his phone and read the whole speech from the screen. The audience includes elders who attend church services conducted in Vagahau Niue every week.
1. Identify three changes Manu must make to the draft and explain the reason for each, including what he should do about the sentence translated word for word from English.
Read the worked answer
1. Pronoun number. 'Fakaalofa atu ki a koe' addresses one person. Twelve people are in front of him, so the greeting must be plural - ki a koutou. This is not a small slip: getting number wrong in the first line tells the elders he has not looked at who is in the room.
2. Formulaic language at the edges. The opening and the closing of a formal welcome are largely fixed, and the audience expects the recognised greeting and a closing that blesses the visit rather than a casual 'see you'. He should use the forms he has heard at community events, not the ones from family chat.
3. English fillers and repetition. 'Yeah', 'so', and four uses of mitaki in 90 seconds make a formal speech sound like conversation. Keep one mitaki where it carries meaning and let the other sentences do the work themselves.
The word-for-word sentence is the real problem: it is English word order with Niuean words dropped in. Rebuild it Niuean-first - short clauses, verb early, one idea per sentence. Plain and correct beats ambitious and wrong.
2. With two days left, should Manu memorise the speech, use cue cards, or read from his phone? Justify the choice.
Read the worked answer
Memorise the edges, cue the middle.
- The greeting, the naming of the guests and the closing are short, formulaic, and the places where a stumble is most visible. Learn those exactly - they are also the parts he can deliver while actually looking at people.
- The middle should hang on five cue words in large writing on one card, one per idea (guests, school, thanks, gift or exchange, closing).
- Reading from the phone fails for practical reasons before it fails for cultural ones: the screen is small, he will look down for most of 90 seconds, the audience can see the phone, and a phone that dims or buzzes mid-speech becomes something else he has to manage.
- Two days is enough for the edges and five cues. It is not enough for 200 words verbatim, and attempting it raises the chance of a blank while removing his way back.
3. At forty-five seconds Manu loses his place completely. What should he do in the next five seconds, and what should he not do?
Read the worked answer
Have one sentence that restarts the speech from anywhere. He should plan it in advance: a fixed bridging line thanking the guests for coming, which is true wherever he is standing in the speech. That buys two seconds and returns him to the cue card.
Then he moves to the next cue word, not the next word. The audience cannot see the gap between his notes and his mouth; they only see the pause.
Do not apologise at length, and do not switch to English. A short apology and a confident restart reads as composure - the assessor is judging delivery, not flawlessness. If the thread is genuinely gone, go straight to the closing formula and finish cleanly. A seventy-second speech that ends properly scores better than ninety seconds that collapses, because the closing formula is the part the elders will remember and the part the schedule can credit.