Disagreeing in a Group Discussion Without Losing Face
Three Level 2 students have four minutes to plan a Chinese cultural evening for Year 10. The teacher listens and scores interaction: asking questions, giving opinions, disagreeing politely, and repairing breakdowns. The group has a budget of NZ$60 and must leave the hall by 8:30 p.m. Mei proposes a calligraphy stall: “我们写书法吧，很酷。” Tom wants dumpling-making, but one classmate has a sesame allergy. The candidate, Alex, thinks calligraphy takes too long to set up and prefers a Chinese quiz. Alex often translates “I don’t think so” word-for-word as “我不觉得” and tends to speak over others when nervous. The teacher has warned that the group must reach a decision, not just list ideas. Alex also does not know the Chinese word for “sesame” and may need to explain the allergy without switching entirely to English.
1. Alex wants to reject the calligraphy idea and propose a quiz. Write one spoken turn in Chinese that disagrees politely, gives a reason tied to a constraint, and invites a response. Explain two features that make it suitable.
Read the worked answer
A suitable turn is: “书法这个想法不错，不过收拾起来可能比较花时间，八点半以前不一定来得及。我们要不要考虑做一个中文知识问答？大家觉得怎么样？” It opens with “这个想法不错”, which acknowledges Mei’s contribution before disagreeing; “不过” signals a soft contrast rather than a flat rejection. The reason is tied to the actual 8:30 hall deadline, so the objection is about feasibility, not about Mei. “我们要不要考虑……” is a suggestion that shares the decision, and “大家觉得怎么样？” invites the group rather than closing discussion. This avoids “我不觉得”, which in Chinese often sounds like a blunt personal judgement, especially without a softener. The turn also keeps the task moving toward a decision.
2. The group is running out of time and Mei repeats her idea. Alex needs to interrupt and move to a decision. Give a suitable Chinese utterance and explain how it manages face and task.
Read the worked answer
A suitable utterance is: “不好意思，打断一下，我们只剩一分钟了。要不我们先投票决定，好吗？” “不好意思，打断一下” marks the interruption as a necessary move and softens it; it does not criticise Mei. The time pressure is framed as a shared problem (“我们只剩一分钟了”), not “你别说了”. “要不我们……” proposes a procedure, and “好吗” invites consent. Voting also gives Mei’s idea a fair hearing without endless repetition. If Alex simply says “别说了，投票”, it may win the turn but damage group harmony and lose interaction marks for polite disagreement.
3. Alex does not know the Chinese word for “sesame”. What repair strategy should he use mid-conversation, and why is a direct translation risky? Give a Chinese example.
Read the worked answer
He should use a communication strategy: ask for the word or paraphrase in Chinese, then continue. For example: “不好意思，芝麻的中文怎么说？--就是那种很小的、可以撒在饺子上的东西。有人吃了会过敏。” If he does not know 芝麻, he can say “一种很小的东西，有人吃了会过敏，所以包饺子不能用”. The aim is to keep the planning moving and show he can repair a gap. A direct translation is risky because he may guess a wrong word or pronounce it unintentionally; a wrong food term in an allergy discussion is a safety issue, not just a language error. Switching completely to English may solve the immediate problem but loses the chance to demonstrate circumlocution, which is part of the interaction criteria.