Consulting on haka and sāsā material for Culture Week
A mixed group of five Level 2 students is preparing a three-minute work for Culture Week. Two students are Māori, one is Samoan, and two are Pākehā. The group wants to combine contemporary dance with haka and sāsā movements to explore 'connection to ancestors'. They have six weeks and one 90-minute rehearsal each week. A draft programme note says: 'This dance is a fusion of Māori and Samoan culture.' The teacher is supportive but worried about cultural appropriateness and has asked the group to explain its process before rehearsals continue. One student says, 'It's okay because my grandparents are Māori.' Another says, 'We should just make it look authentic.' The local community has a kapa haka group and a Samoan church youth group.
1. Recommend a process the group should follow before rehearsing the haka and sāsā material. Justify each step.
Read the worked answer
First, pause rehearsals of the cultural material and consult separately with Māori and Samoan cultural advisors: the school's iwi liaison or local kapa haka group, and the Samoan church youth leader. Do not ask one advisor to speak for both communities, because haka and sāsā are distinct forms with different protocols. Second, ask what is appropriate to share in this context, what is tapu or restricted, and whether permission is needed for specific material. Third, clarify provenance and gender roles; haka is not a generic 'energetic' style, and sāsā has community performance conventions. Fourth, if permission is not given for specific material, create original movement from the students' own ideas about ancestry without copying the cultural forms. Fifth, credit advisors and sources in the programme and keep a record of the consultation. The reasoning is that a student's family background alone does not authorise the use of cultural material, and 'looking authentic' is not a protocol. Consultation is relational and ongoing, and mixing two distinct forms into a vague fusion can flatten their meaning.
2. Rewrite the programme note and explain the changes.
Read the worked answer
Original: 'This dance is a fusion of Māori and Samoan culture.' Problems: it implies an equal blend and group ownership, gives no credit, and uses 'fusion' vaguely. Rewrite: 'This three-minute work is choreographed by the student group as a contemporary response to ideas of ancestry and connection. The group consulted [named advisors or groups] about the Māori and Samoan material included. Haka and sāsā are distinct cultural forms and are not presented as interchangeable. We thank [names] for their guidance and permission. Any errors are ours.' The changes make the note specific about who choreographed, who advised and what was permitted. It distinguishes the two forms instead of treating them as one 'Polynesian' flavour, and it avoids claiming authenticity or speaking for communities. The note also signals that the students are accountable for the work rather than hiding behind culture. If permission is withdrawn, the note must change accordingly, even if that means cutting the cultural material.
3. A parent complains that mixing haka and sāsā is disrespectful. How should the group respond, and what would count as a good outcome?
Read the worked answer
The group should listen without defensiveness, thank the parent, and explain the process already followed rather than arguing that 'it's okay because my grandparents are Māori'. Offer to share the consultation record and the programme note. If the parent identifies a real issue, such as restricted material, incorrect gender roles or inadequate permission, the group should remove or change that section. If the complaint is based on misinformation, provide context and, where appropriate, ask the cultural advisors to speak rather than debating the parent. A good outcome is not winning the argument; it is a more respectful work and a maintained relationship with the community. The group should be prepared to accept that the safest choice may be to cut the cultural material and keep the contemporary work. That decision would still meet the assessment because the choreographic ideas about ancestry can be expressed without using forms the group is not authorised to perform.