The Open Evening Video
A school's student-run social media account has 1,800 followers and is asked to promote the school's open evening, nine days away. The team plans a 20-second vertical video using a trending audio clip from an artist currently in the news over a controversial court case. The choreography involves 14 students, mostly aged 15-16, filmed in the school gym. The team's target is 10,000 views in a week. The account has posted twice weekly for a year and averages about 700 views per post. A parent emails the principal objecting to the audio and to students "being used as marketing". The principal asks the teacher in charge to decide whether the post goes ahead.
1. Decide whether the post should go ahead as planned. Justify your decision with reference to the likely risks and benefits.
Read the worked answer
The post should not go ahead with that audio, but the video concept can proceed. The audio is the problem, not the dance.
Three risks attach to the audio. First, the artist is currently in the news over a court case; using the clip links the school's open evening marketing to an unresolved controversy that the school does not control. Second, the parent has already complained, which means the decision will be scrutinised and the school needs a reasoned position rather than "it's just a trend". Third, platform rules may restrict trending commercial sounds for accounts that function as brand or business accounts, so the team may find the audio muted or the post demoted.
Against this, the benefits are modest. The account averages about 700 views; a target of 10,000 is more than fourteen times the baseline and is unlikely without paid promotion or cross-posting. The video's real value is showing student life and driving open evening attendance, which does not depend on this specific sound.
Recommendation: re-edit with licensed, neutral or original audio and post within the nine days. Keep the choreography and student participation, because those carry the authentic appeal. Note the decision in writing so the principal has a clear record.
2. Explain the consent and representation issues raised by filming 14 students, mostly aged 15-16.
Read the worked answer
Fourteen identifiable students, most of them minors, are being filmed for a public account. Consent should be opt-in, not assumed from participation in a school activity. That means explaining where the video will appear, how long it may stay up, and who will see it, then obtaining agreement from students and, where the school's policy requires it, from caregivers. Students who decline should still be able to take part in the event without being filmed, and anyone who later withdraws should be cut or blurred.
Representation matters too. A 20-second video reduces students to a visual style; the school should consider who is shown, who is not, and whether the choreography plays on stereotypes. The parent's phrase "being used as marketing" is a fair prompt: the students are not just performers, they are the product being advertised. That does not make the video unethical, but it does require that students understand the purpose and can say no.
The gym setting and vertical format are conventional and low-risk. The consent process, not the aesthetic, is where the real judgement lies.
3. How should the team measure whether the video succeeded, and how should that measurement shape the plan?
Read the worked answer
Views alone are a weak measure. The stated target of 10,000 views is unrealistic given a baseline of about 700 and 1,800 followers, and chasing it encourages clickbait choices such as the controversial audio. The team should set a target that reflects the actual goal - attendance at the open evening - and track a small set of indicators.
Useful measures include reach relative to baseline (for example, 2,000-2,500 views, roughly three times the average), saves and shares, profile visits, and comments. More important is conversion: a QR code or a trackable link on the open evening page, or a dedicated registration form, would show whether the video produced enquiries rather than just impressions. A simple before-and-after comparison over the nine days is enough for a student project.
The measurement plan should also include a review point: if the video underperforms after 48 hours, the team can boost it through the school's other channels rather than changing the concept at the last minute. That keeps the decision tied to the open evening rather than to a vanity number.