NZ Music Investigation: Description, Sources, and Cultural Accuracy
A Year 12 student is investigating 'the use of te reo Māori in New Zealand pop' for AS91278. Over six weeks she drafts 1,500 words. Her sources are a Wikipedia article, a fan blog, a YouTube lyric video, and one RNZ interview with a producer. She states that Poi E (1984) is 'a traditional waiata passed down through generations' and includes a line-by-line English translation copied from the lyric video without a citation. She has not consulted a Māori cultural advisor or the song's composer or estate. Her teacher notes that the draft describes the song's chart success but says little about musical features, and that the student's own voice appears only in the final paragraph. The submission is due in two weeks.
1. Evaluate the draft against the requirements of AS91278. Distinguish between describing an aspect of NZ music and investigating it, and comment on source quality and cultural accuracy.
Read the worked answer
An investigation needs a focused question, purposeful sources, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. This draft mostly describes: it reports chart success but does not explain how te reo Māori is used musically - pronunciation, vocables, rhythm, instrumentation, or the relationship between text and groove. The sources are weak for an investigation: Wikipedia and a fan blog are secondary and unverified; a lyric video is not a reliable source for translation or history; one RNZ interview is useful but not enough. The factual claim that Poi E is a traditional waiata is wrong: it is a composed 1984 pop song, and that distinction matters for cultural context. Copying a translation without attribution is an academic integrity issue and also risks misrepresenting the text. To meet AS91278, the student should narrow the question, use reliable NZ sources such as Te Ara, NZ On Screen, RNZ, the composer's estate, and iwi radio, consult a Māori cultural advisor or iwi/hapū representative, and add close listening with timestamps. The student's own voice should run through the analysis, not appear only at the end.
2. What practical steps should the teacher take before the submission deadline, and what should the student do about the copied translation?
Read the worked answer
Before the deadline, the teacher should: (1) discuss the copied translation with the student and require removal or permission plus citation; (2) ask for a source-evaluation table that states each source's purpose, author, date, and reliability; (3) arrange a cultural consultation through the school's Māori department or local iwi; (4) set two checkpoints - one for a narrowed question and source list, one for a draft with musical analysis. The student should correct the 'traditional waiata' claim to 'composed Māori-language pop song', attribute any translation, and preferably produce their own translation with help rather than copy one. If permission cannot be obtained, the student can summarise the meaning in their own words and cite the source. The teacher should not rewrite the draft. If time is too short, narrow the scope to one song and three reliable sources rather than submit a broad, unsupported survey. The final submission should show what the student investigated, how they evaluated sources, and why the aspect matters in Aotearoa New Zealand music.