Curating Literacy at Pompeii Under Label Constraints
A small regional museum is installing a four-case display on 'Reading and writing in Pompeii'. Each case holds one object; labels are capped at 60 words; the whole display must fit a 3-metre wall. The curator has five candidates: a wax school tablet bearing a line of Virgil, a fresco from a bakery showing a woman and a customer, a mosaic threshold reading CAVE CANEM, a stone block carrying an election notice for a candidate, and a graffito scratched inside a house. The education officer wants the display to claim that 'Pompeii was a highly literate society'. The director is worried about representativeness: the wax tablet is an elite school exercise, the election notice was painted by a professional scriptor, and the graffito is anonymous. The budget covers only three interpretive panels if a fourth object is added. A local Latin teacher has offered to lend a modern replica of a stylus.
1. Choose four objects for the display and state a claim the display can defensibly support. Justify one exclusion.
Read the worked answer
Choose the wax tablet, the election notice, the CAVE CANEM mosaic, and the graffito. The bakery fresco should be excluded because it depicts trade and daily life, not writing, and a display with only four cases cannot afford an object that does not advance the argument. The defensible claim is: 'Writing in Pompeii appeared in public, domestic, and educational settings, but most surviving examples are formulaic, professional, or elite.' The wax tablet shows a school exercise and therefore literacy transmission, but it is a literary text used by someone with leisure. The election notice shows public communication, but it was produced by a professional painter and commissioned by a candidate. CAVE CANEM is a functional domestic warning and may have been stock decoration. The graffito is the most spontaneous and the least elite, but it is anonymous and often formulaic. Together the four objects support variety, not mass literacy.
2. Rewrite the education officer's claim as two sentences a historian would accept, addressing the problem of representativeness.
Read the worked answer
The education officer's claim fails because the surviving evidence is skewed toward durable materials and commissioned work. Wooden tablets, papyrus, and painted notices on perishable surfaces have mostly vanished, and the examples that survive over-represent stone, mosaic, and elite school texts. A historian would accept something like: 'Writing was embedded in Pompeian public life, from election notices to domestic warnings, and some residents could read and write at a level that included canonical poetry. The surviving evidence cannot show how widely those skills were distributed, because it is biased toward durable, commissioned, and elite objects.' This keeps the display's appeal while making the evidential limit part of the message. The two sentences also give the labels a rationale: each object is presented as a type of evidence with a known bias, not as a representative sample of the whole population.
3. How should the display handle the loaned modern replica of a stylus, given the budget for only three panels?
Read the worked answer
The replica should be included only if it is clearly labelled as a modern reconstruction and if its interpretive panel replaces, rather than adds to, one of the three panels. Its value is tactile: visitors can feel the shape of the tool and understand how a wax tablet was used. Its danger is that a replica can acquire false authority, especially in a small museum where original objects are few. The panel should say what the replica is based on, that the original would have been bronze or iron, and that it is not evidence for literacy rates. If the budget forces a choice, the replica should be cut before any original object is cut, because the display's argument depends on the ancient evidence, not on handling. A handling table outside the cases would solve the problem without consuming wall space or a panel.