Trio Choreography: Keeping the Lift or Developing the Idea?
At a Year 13 dance class, a student is choreographing a two-minute trio for three dancers for 91589. The intention is to explore 'pressure and release' through contact improvisation. One dancer has a shoulder injury and cannot safely perform the planned overhead lift in the middle section. The choreographer has six weeks, two 50-minute rehearsals per week, and a fixed sound score. The middle section currently contains the lift, a fall-and-catch, and a group circle that the dancers enjoy but that does not clearly change the movement idea. The teacher says the work reads as a series of interesting moments rather than a coherent whole. The choreographer wants to keep the lift because it gets a reaction in showing, and to add a new ending with a spoken-word section. The group has already missed one rehearsal because of a school event.
1. What should the choreographer do about the lift, the circle, and the proposed spoken-word ending? Justify your advice by reference to the intention and the requirements of 91589.
Read the worked answer
The choreographer should not keep the overhead lift. Safety is a prior condition for assessment evidence, and a shoulder injury makes the lift an unacceptable risk. The intention is 'pressure and release', which can be developed through weight-sharing, counterbalance, and sustained contact rather than an overhead lift. A safer replacement could be a low counterbalance where the injured dancer remains grounded and the others take weight gradually, then release. That keeps the idea and allows the injured dancer to participate.
The circle should be cut or reworked. Enjoyment is not evidence of development. If the circle does not change the movement idea, it is decorative. The choreographer could use it as a structural device: repeat the circle phrase, then fragment it, change the level, or have one dancer break the circle to signal release. That would develop rather than repeat.
The spoken-word ending is risky this late. It introduces a new medium and may not resolve the movement idea. If the words directly clarify the intention, they could work, but the choreographer should first try a movement resolution: slow the contact, separate the dancers, and end on a held counterbalance.
Reasoning: 91589 asks for development and resolution of ideas, not novelty or audience reaction. The choreographer needs a coherent arc. Replacing the lift and reworking the circle would give clearer evidence of development, safety, and resolution.
2. What evidence should the student document for the assessor, and how should they use the remaining rehearsals to generate it?
Read the worked answer
Evidence should show the choreographic process, not only the final performance. The student should keep:
- video of the middle section before and after the change, with a short note explaining why the lift was replaced and how the new contact develops pressure and release;
- an annotated rehearsal log with dates, problems, decisions, and dancer feedback;
- a movement phrase map showing where the idea is stated, developed, and resolved;
- teacher or peer feedback notes and the student's response.
The remaining rehearsals should be used in cycles: rehearse a section, record it, review it against the intention, make one change, and re-record. The student should reserve at least one rehearsal for a full run with the fixed sound score and for checking that the injured dancer can safely complete the work. They should also record a short verbal explanation, because the assessor needs to understand the intended idea and how the movement resolves it. This evidence matters because 91589 is assessed on the choreographic process and the resolution of ideas, not on a single showing or on audience reaction.