NCEA Level 3 Home Economics study materials
NCEA Level 3 Home Economics study resources

Marae hui: compostable or reusable tableware?

NCEA Level 3 Home Economics · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Marae hui: compostable or reusable tableware?

Te Hono Marae will host a three-day hui for 180 guests. The marae committee has budgeted $4,200 for food. The local iwi garden can supply 40% of the vegetables in season. The current plan uses 540 single-use plastic plates per day, 1,200 plastic cups over the hui, and produces about 28 kg of food waste daily. The council does not collect commercial compost, and the nearest commercial composting facility is 45 km away. A caterer quotes $0.45 per compostable plate, but the plates require commercial composting. Reusable plates can be hired for $0.60 per plate, with washing estimated at $0.22 per plate and 1,800 L of water per day. The marae has a commercial dishwasher but needs two volunteers per meal. The committee wants to reduce waste and demonstrate kaitiakitanga, but some kaumātua are concerned about extra work and cost, and the hui is only four weeks away.

1. Evaluate two options for tableware - compostable single-use plates versus reusable hire - using environmental, economic, and social/cultural sustainability criteria.

Read the worked answer

Option A - compostable plates: cost is $0.45 × 540 × 3 = $729. Environmentally, the plates only compost in a commercial facility, and the nearest one is 45 km away. The council does not collect commercial compost, so the plates may end up in landfill, where they can generate methane. Transport adds emissions. Economically, they are cheaper up front, but the ‘compostable’ label is misleading without a facility.

Option B - reusable hire: cost is ($0.60 + $0.22) × 540 × 3 = $1,328, about $599 more. Environmentally, reuse avoids 1,620 single-use plates but uses 1,800 L of water per day and energy for washing. Over many hui, the impact per use falls. Economically, it costs more now but builds marae capacity and avoids waste-disposal costs. Socially and culturally, reuse aligns with kaitiakitanga and manaakitanga, but it adds volunteer work. The kaumātua’s concern about workload is valid and must be addressed.

Judgement: reusable is environmentally preferable only if washing is efficient and volunteers are supported. Compostable is not circular here because there is no local composting route. The marae should choose reuse with a volunteer roster, or use compostable plates only if a verified composting collection can be arranged.

2. Recommend a sustainable food plan for the hui, including how to manage food waste and volunteer capacity, and justify the trade-offs.

Read the worked answer

Recommendation: use reusable plates and cups for seated meals. Hire 200 sets and wash in two batches. Recruit six volunteers per meal with a roster that pairs experienced and new volunteers, and feed volunteers as part of manaakitanga. Use the iwi garden for 40% of vegetables and design a seasonal menu.

Food waste: weigh waste daily and set a target of 10 kg per day, down from 28 kg. Offer safe leftovers to volunteers and whānau, and set up a three-bin on-site system - food scraps, recycling, landfill - with a small worm farm or compost heap. This avoids the 45 km transport problem. Ask the iwi garden to take compostable scraps.

Cost and trade-offs: the reusable option costs about $599 more than compostable plates, so reallocate from the disposable budget and ask iwi to sponsor washing supplies. Reuse uses more water, but it avoids 1,620 plates and the hidden cost of landfill. The extra volunteer work is real, so keep the roster small and explicit.

Evaluation: measure waste kg/day, water use, volunteer hours and cost per guest. This plan demonstrates kaitiakitanga while managing the kaumātua’s workload concern, rather than choosing the cheapest option that is not truly sustainable.