Reading a business refusal hidden in keigo
You are reading a blog post by a Japanese university student, Haruto, about a two-week remote internship with a Tokyo IT company. He quotes an email he received after asking to extend the internship: 「検討させていただきます。ただ、現在、受け入れ枠が少ない状況です。」 He also quotes a follow-up: 「前向きに検討していますが、来週までお待ちいただけますか。」 Haruto writes, 「つまり、OKということだと思いました。」 Two weeks later, he received: 「今回は見送らせていただきます。」 He is confused because he thought the earlier emails were positive. The blog has 12 comments; one says, 「社会人としては、そのメールは遠回しな断りに見えます。」 Haruto's own writing is casual だ・である style, but the quoted emails use business keigo. You must explain where his inference went wrong.
1. Explain why Haruto's interpretation of the first two emails was not supported by the Japanese.
Read the worked answer
Haruto treated polite forms as positive content. In fact, 「検討させていただきます」 is a deferral: it commits the writer to considering, not to accepting. The following 「ただ、現在、受け入れ枠が少ない状況です」 is a soft negative signal - it introduces a constraint before any yes. The second email's 「前向きに検討しています」 is warmer but still not a decision; the request 「来週までお待ちいただけますか」 buys time and keeps the option open. None of these phrases contains an acceptance. 「見送らせていただきます」 is the explicit refusal, using the same humble pattern to soften it. Haruto's error is a register error: he reads keigo as friendliness or agreement, when it often creates distance and allows the writer to avoid a direct no.
2. Give two concrete strategies a student could use to read this kind of email more accurately.
Read the worked answer
First, separate politeness from propositional content: underline the actual decision words (検討, 見送り, 難しい, 枠) and ask whether any of them means 'yes'. Second, treat time-buying and constraint phrases as signals to wait or ask a clarifying question, e.g. 「来週までに可否を教えていただけますか」. A third strategy is to compare the first email with the final one: the same humble construction 「させていただきます」 appears in both, so the politeness cannot be the message. Strong answers note that asking for clarification is culturally acceptable when phrased with お手数ですが or 恐れ入りますが.