Elision at the Start of a Hexameter: Reading and Translating a Tossed Figure
During preparation for a recitation of dactylic hexameter, a candidate is given the line 'litora multum ille et terris iactatus et alto' with the instruction to mark elisions and read it aloud. A classmate argues that every written syllable must be pronounced because 'the poet wrote it'. The candidate must decide how to handle the two elisions and explain how the reading affects the line's movement. The teacher adds a constraint: the English translation for the commentary must not simply drop the elided words, but must convey their sense. The line describes a figure tossed on land and sea. The candidate has 10 minutes to annotate, read, and write a two-sentence justification. No scansion marks are supplied except the line itself; the candidate must identify where elision occurs and why.
1. Identify the elisions in the line and explain how the line should be read aloud.
Read the worked answer
There are two elisions: final -um of multum before ille, and final -e of ille before et. Read them as mult' ille and ill' et, so the sequence runs mult' ill' et terris... The elided syllables are not deleted from the sense; they are suppressed in pronunciation because a final vowel or vowel + -m before a vowel is absorbed. The reading should keep the beat and not pause at word boundaries. A reader who pronounces every written syllable will produce extra syllables and break the hexameter; a reader who over-pauses at the elisions will make the line stutter. The two elisions cluster at the start, so the line begins with a rapid, crowded movement.
2. Explain how the elisions contribute to the line's movement and meaning.
Read the worked answer
The elisions compress three words (multum ille et) into a faster opening. That speed suits the sense of iactatus, 'tossed', because the reader is hurried across the word boundaries just as the figure is driven across land and sea. The effect is not simply decorative: the line's sound enacts instability. At the same time, the elisions delay the clear noun phrase, so the hearer does not get a stable subject immediately. The line feels restless before it settles into terris... et alto. If the elisions were removed, the opening would be heavier and more separated, and the impression of continuous buffeting would weaken.
3. The commentary translation must not drop the elided words. Draft a translation and explain the choice.
Read the worked answer
Draft: 'That man, much tossed both on land and on sea...' The words multum and ille are not omitted; multum becomes 'much' and ille 'that man'. The elision is a feature of pronunciation, not of meaning. A translation that writes 'tossed on land and sea' loses the emphasis of multum and the pointed deictic ille. Keeping 'that man' also preserves the contrast between the individual and the vast spaces. The translation should read naturally in English but must account for every Latin word before elision; the elision is handled in the reading, not by deleting sense.