The 7 a.m. Opening: A Staff Notice That Cannot Be Vague
You work 20 hours a week at Harbour Light Café, which currently opens at 8:00 a.m. From Monday 1 August it will open at 7:00 a.m., and the owner has asked you to tell the team. There are 14 staff. Four are under 18 and cannot start before 7:00 a.m. under the roster rules; two of those four catch a 6:55 a.m. bus and would arrive at 7:20. Two staff have already asked to keep their 8:00 a.m. starts because of school drop-offs. The new roster is not finalised: the owner says it will be posted by 20 July. You have been asked to put a notice on the staff-room wall and to send a short message to the group chat. The last notice you wrote was returned by the owner with 'too vague - people need dates' written on it.
1. What must the notice say, and what must it not say, given that the roster is not yet finalised?
Read the worked answer
It must say: the café's opening time changes to 7:00 a.m. from Monday 1 August; individual shift start times are not decided yet; the roster will be posted by 20 July; anyone with a constraint (bus times, school drop-off, the under-18 start rule) should tell you by 18 July so it can be built in; and who to talk to. Those are all facts you actually hold, and each one has a date on it, which is what the owner was asking for.
It must not say anything that sounds like a promise about individuals, such as 'no one will start before 7:30' or 'your hours won't change'. You cannot deliver that, and a notice is the written record staff will point to later. It also must not imply the change is optional or still being discussed, because it isn't. The key move is separating 'what is changing' from 'what is not yet decided' into two clearly headed lines, so a tired reader at the end of a shift cannot merge them into one idea.
2. Write the group chat message (maximum 50 words) and explain two ways it differs from the wall notice.
Read the worked answer
Sample: 'Heads up team - from Mon 1 Aug we open at 7am, not 8. Your own shift times aren't sorted yet; roster goes up by 20 July. If a 7am start is impossible for you, tell me before 18 July. Full notice on the staff-room wall.'
Difference one: length and format. A chat message is read in about three seconds on a phone, so it drops the headings, the explanation of the under-18 rule and the contact block, and keeps only what someone needs to act on today. Difference two: authority. The wall notice is the record; the chat message points to it rather than replacing it, because chat scrolls away and cannot be checked in three weeks. That is why the message ends by naming the notice.
What does not change is the date and the deadline - 1 August, 20 July, 18 July. A short message is not a vague one; it just carries fewer items.
3. A staff member reads the notice and says, 'So I'm on 7 a.m. starts from now on then?' Identify what in your draft could cause that reading and how you would fix it.
Read the worked answer
The likely cause is that the first line announces the café's new opening time, and the reader supplies the missing step themselves: café opens earlier, therefore my shift starts earlier. Nothing in that sentence says otherwise, and people read notices looking for what applies to them, not for what is still undecided.
The fix is a line that does the negative work explicitly, placed immediately under the change: 'Your individual start times are not in this notice. They will be confirmed in the roster posted by 20 July.' A heading that separates the two blocks - 'What is changing' and 'What is not decided yet' - makes the distinction visible before the reader gets to the detail. Naming a person and a date ('Talk to Ana before 18 July') gives the reader somewhere to go with their question instead of guessing. If one person has misread it, others will have too, so the fix belongs in the notice, not in a reply to that one staff member.