NCEA Literacy Writing Co-requisite study materials
NCEA Literacy Writing Co-requisite study resources

The $1,240 Mufti Day: Choosing Detail Under a Word Limit

NCEA Literacy Writing Co-requisite · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The $1,240 Mufti Day: Choosing Detail Under a Word Limit

You are applying for a $3,000 regional scholarship. The form asks for a statement of no more than 250 words answering: 'Describe a time you made a difference in your community.' Your strongest example is a mufti day you organised for the local women's refuge. The first version was a non-uniform day with a gold-coin entry; only 12 students paid and it raised $14. You changed the plan: you asked the principal for a mufti day with a $2 entry, got permission to run a lunchtime quiz with a $50 prize donated by a local bakery, and put posters up in the four form-class corridors. The second version raised $1,240, with 260 students taking part. You also have a three-year perfect attendance record, grade 8 piano, and a weekend job at a supermarket. The assessors read roughly 300 statements.

1. Explain which details you would include and which you would cut, and why.

Read the worked answer

Include: the failed first attempt ($14 from 12 students), the specific change you made (approach to the principal, $2 entry, donated prize, posters in four corridors) and the result ($1,240 from 260 students). The failure is the most valuable material in the whole application, because it shows you noticed something was not working and revised it - that is judgement, which is what a scholarship panel is actually looking for, and it cannot be faked by someone who simply had a successful event.

Cut: grade 8 piano, perfect attendance and the supermarket job. They answer a different question ('tell us about yourself'), not this one. At 250 words you have roughly three short paragraphs, and every sentence spent on piano is a sentence not spent on the prompt you were asked. Perfect attendance in particular is a passive achievement; it says nothing about making a difference to anyone else. Also cut adjectives such as 'passionate' and 'inspiring', which take up words and prove nothing. Let the numbers do the persuading - $14, $2, 260, $1,240 are concrete and checkable.

2. Write the topic sentence for your second paragraph and explain what job it does.

Read the worked answer

Sample: 'When the gold-coin version raised only $14, I realised students would pay more for something to do than for permission to wear mufti.'

The sentence has three jobs. It marks the turn in the story, so the reader knows the paragraph is about the revision rather than more background. It makes a claim - that the problem was the offer, not the students' generosity - which the rest of the paragraph then supports with the $2 entry, the quiz and the $1,240 total. And it keeps you in the paragraph as the person who drew the conclusion, which is what 'a time you made a difference' is asking about.

A weaker version would be 'Then I changed the plan', which announces an event but not a thought, so the reader has to work out why the change mattered. With assessors reading 300 statements, a topic sentence that carries the point saves them that work.

3. A friend says, 'Just write that you're passionate about helping people - they like that.' Explain why that phrasing is weak and what you would put in its place.

Read the worked answer

'Passionate about helping people' is a claim, not evidence. Anyone can write it, including the applicants who did nothing, so it distinguishes you from nobody. It is also one of the most common phrases in scholarship writing, which means an assessor reading their thirtieth statement of the day will skim straight past it. In a 250-word limit, a whole sentence spent on it costs you a specific detail you could have used instead.

Replace it with something only you could write: 'I asked the principal for a $2 mufti day and a quiz with a donated prize, because the gold-coin version had shown students would pay for something to do.' That sentence carries the same commitment but proves it with an action and a reason. If you want the feeling on the page, earn it - state the result and let the assessor conclude that you care, rather than telling them to.