The Retired Client and the Leveraged Currency Futures Recommendation
Margaret, 68, is a retired teacher with a $420,000 term-deposit portfolio, NZ Super of $1,850 a month and no derivatives experience. Her adviser, Ben, is an authorised body of an NZX derivatives participant. In a 25-minute meeting she says she wants 'a bit more income but cannot afford to lose capital'. Ben records her risk profile as 'growth' and recommends selling NZD/USD futures to generate income, using $60,000 as margin. He emails a one-page product summary, a client agreement and a high-risk acknowledgement, but no personalised suitability statement. Ben's firm earns a $2,400 upfront commission plus a per-side spread. Six weeks later a 3.8% adverse currency move triggers a $9,500 variation margin call; Margaret's term deposit is not due for four months and she cannot fund it. She calls Ben asking whether she can 'just ignore the margin call until the dollar comes back'.
1. Identify the suitability and advice-process failures in Ben's conduct, and explain what evidence he should have obtained before recommending the strategy.
Read the worked answer
Ben has not established suitability. A short futures position has leveraged, potentially unlimited loss and requires ready liquidity for variation margin. Margaret's investable assets are mostly term deposits, her regular income is NZ Super, and she expressly said she cannot afford capital loss. Recording 'growth' after that statement is internally inconsistent and needs a documented rationale, not a label.
Before advice, Ben should have gathered and verified: objectives (income versus capital preservation), financial situation (term-deposit maturities, emergency reserve, debts), risk tolerance tested with scenarios such as 'a $9,500 margin call due tomorrow', knowledge and experience, and capacity to meet ongoing margin obligations. He should have stress-tested a 5-10% adverse currency move and documented why a non-leveraged or lower-risk alternative was rejected.
The one-page summary plus a high-risk acknowledgement is not a suitability assessment. The file should show the product's risks mapped to the client's objectives and a clear explanation of why the recommendation is in her interests.
2. What conflicts and disclosure issues arise from the $2,400 commission and per-side spread, and what should the client have been told?
Read the worked answer
The remuneration creates a conflict: an upfront commission rewards the sale, and a per-side spread rewards turnover. Selling futures to generate 'income' can be presented as a yield strategy when it is really a leveraged directional position with margin risk. Ben must disclose the amount and method of remuneration before or when giving advice, in writing, and obtain informed consent.
Margaret should have been told plainly: how the commission and spread are charged; that leverage magnifies both gains and losses; that a margin call can arrive at short notice; that failing to meet it can lead to close-out at a loss; that losses can exceed the $60,000 posted; and how the firm handles client money and margin. The high-risk acknowledgement does not cure an unsuitable recommendation. Disclosure must be specific to her circumstances, not a generic form.
3. Margaret cannot meet the margin call. Outline the immediate steps Ben and the participant should take, including remediation and record-keeping.
Read the worked answer
Ben must not tell her to ignore the call. He should immediately explain the deadline, the participant's right to close out, and the options: deposit funds, reduce or close the position, or provide acceptable collateral. Any instruction from Margaret should be confirmed in writing. The participant should follow its client agreement and clearing arrangements, give required notices, and if the call remains unmet, close out only what is necessary in an orderly way and calculate the realised loss and charges.
The matter should be escalated to compliance. The firm should assess whether the advice breached suitability and disclosure obligations, preserve the meeting notes, correspondence, risk profile, commission disclosure and call records, and consider remediation or compensation if the advice caused the loss. Ben should stop making further recommendations to Margaret until the review is complete, and the firm should check whether other clients received similar leveraged recommendations.