Discharge planning for a rural Māori kaumātua after stroke
Mr Tāne Rewi, 68, Ngāti Porou, is day 5 after a left middle cerebral artery infarct. He has dense right hemiparesis, left neglect, and mild dysphagia. He lives with his wife (who has osteoarthritis and diabetes) and a 15-year-old mokopuna in a rural settlement 45 minutes from Gisborne Hospital. The house has three steps at the entrance and no handrails. He wants to go home 'to die on his whenua' and his whānau have asked for a hui. The ward physiotherapist has assessed him as requiring two-person assistance for transfers and a hoist for toileting. The occupational therapist is on leave, the social worker has 12 other discharges, and the rural hospital has no inpatient rehabilitation beds. His wife says she can care for him because 'that is what whānau do'. The team meeting is tomorrow.
1. How would you apply Te Tiriti o Waitangi principles and cultural safety to this discharge planning?
Read the worked answer
Te Tiriti o Waitangi creates obligations of partnership, participation and protection, and in health this includes active protection of Māori health equity and tino rangatiratanga. I would not treat the hui as a tick-box. I would ask Mr Rewi and his whānau how they want the hui run, who should speak, whether they want karakia or te reo Māori, and who is the decision-maker. I would acknowledge his desire to return to his whenua and explore what that means - dying at home, being with whānau, fulfilling kaitiakitanga. Partnership means sharing power: the whānau's knowledge of his baseline and home is expert knowledge. Participation means enabling them to be involved in goal-setting, not presenting a finished plan. Protection means being honest about the level of care he needs and not colluding with an unsafe discharge. I would also consider equity: rural transport, telehealth access, respite, and the impact on his wife, who has her own health needs. I would offer to involve a Māori health navigator or kaumātua support and document the whānau's preferences. Cultural safety is judged by the whānau, so I would check back with them.
2. What functional, environmental and whānau factors must be addressed before discharge, and how do you prioritise them?
Read the worked answer
Priorities are safety, function, carer capacity and environment. Functionally, he needs two-person transfers and a hoist for toileting; home has three steps and no rails. I would ask occupational therapy to prioritise a home assessment, but OT is on leave - so I would escalate to the team lead rather than let it lapse. Environmental fixes include rails, a commode, hospital bed, and clear access. Carer capacity: his wife's osteoarthritis and diabetes mean she may not be able to provide two-person assistance; whānau support must be real, not assumed. I would map who is available, when, and whether they are willing and able. I would also address dysphagia, medication and follow-up. I would prioritise immediate safety - toileting, falls, skin and pressure - and then mobility goals. A trial home visit with a hoist and two carers would test the plan. If the risks cannot be managed, I would say so clearly and offer alternative options, including a short period in a facility closer to home or interim residential care, while keeping discharge home as the goal.
3. The service manager suggests a telehealth follow-up instead of a home visit to save travel time. How do you reason about this?
Read the worked answer
Telehealth can be useful for follow-up, but it cannot substitute for a home assessment when the key risks are environmental and manual-handling related. I would reason from the purpose: what decision is being made? If the decision is whether the home can safely accommodate a hoist, steps and two carers, I need to see it or have a competent colleague see it. A video call may be adequate for medication review or goal check-in, but not for assessing doorway widths, floor surfaces or carer technique. I would propose a blended plan: one home visit by an OT or physiotherapist, or a trained assessor, then telehealth follow-up. I would explain the risk of a preventable fall or carer injury and document the manager's suggestion and my rationale. I would also check whether the travel cost can be funded under the service specification, rather than letting a budget constraint silently determine clinical risk.