New Zealand Scholarship Drama Assessment study materials
New Zealand Scholarship Drama Assessment study resources

The Monologue That Is Too Big

New Zealand Scholarship Drama Assessment · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Monologue That Is Too Big

A Scholarship Drama candidate is preparing a four-minute monologue for a practical assessment. The character is a middle-aged man, Ray, speaking the day after his wife's funeral. The text never names her death directly, and Ray keeps interrupting himself with practical tasks: folding a towel, checking a lock. The venue is a 90-seat studio with raked seating and no amplification. In the first run the actor plays the grief large: sobbing, a shout, a long collapse onto a chair. The visiting tutor calls it 'external and generalised'. The actor's defence is that an older teacher told him 'the back row must feel it'. He has one week and two rehearsals left. He is strong at comic timing and physically precise gesture; his weakness is sustaining stillness.

1. Diagnose why the tutor called the performance 'external and generalised', and explain what the actor should do differently.

Read the worked answer

The problem is not that the emotion is too big; it is that the emotion is the subject. The actor is playing grief as a result, so the audience sees a display of feeling rather than a person trying to manage it. The text gives the clue: Ray keeps interrupting himself with practical tasks. That is a defence, and the drama lies in the defence, not the collapse. 'External' means the physical signs - sobbing, shout, collapse - are produced on cue without an inner action; 'generalised' means they could belong to any bereaved man. The fix is to give each beat an action: to tidy away, to check the lock, to keep the voice steady, to stop the towel unfolding. The grief then leaks through the failure of those actions. Keep one moment where control breaks, but earn it. This also answers the older teacher's note: the back row needs clarity of action, not volume.

2. Design a one-week rehearsal plan that uses the studio's 90-seat raked configuration and the actor's strengths. Explain how you would judge whether it has worked.

Read the worked answer

Day one: table work on given circumstances and actions; no emotion words allowed. Day two: build a physical score with the towel and the lock; run it with a 'no tears' rule. Day three: stillness work - hold a seated position for 90 seconds while breathing, to tolerate the audience's attention. Day four: place trusted spectators in back, middle and front rows; run with no added volume; ask them what they saw Ray doing, not what they felt. Day five: full run with technical check. Judge success by three signs: the pauses are active, the gestures are precise rather than illustrative, and the back-row watchers can describe Ray's tactic in each beat. In a raked studio the back row is close and above; a supported whisper carries. If he still pushes, remove the shout entirely for one run and see what remains.

3. The actor says that without the big emotional release the audience will be bored. How do you use the space and the character's given circumstances to answer him?

Read the worked answer

Boredom comes from repetition, not from quietness. The big release is currently the only event, so the audience has nothing to lean toward. In a 90-seat raked studio the audience is physically close; they can read a knuckle, a breath, a failed attempt to fold a towel. That intimacy is an asset, not a limitation. Use the given circumstances: Ray has just come from a funeral and is trying to get through the day. His action is to keep the house in order, which means the audience watches him fail at small tasks. The emotional release can happen once, late, and it will land harder because the audience has been watching him hold on. Rehearse a version with no shout at all, then add one back only if the action demands it. The criterion is controlled, truthful characterisation, not intensity.