The pōwhiri the council has already designed
A kapa haka rōpū based at a city tertiary institution, 21 performers, is asked by the city council to lead a pōwhiri for a visiting trade delegation at the civic centre. Of the performers, seven are Pākehā or tauiwi and are relatively new to the rōpū. The council's events officer wants a wero with a taiha at the atrium entrance, a livestream on the council's social media, and the visiting delegation seated in a front row facing the group. The atrium has polished concrete floors and no water source. The group's usual kaitiaki, a kaumātua from the local marae, is overseas and uncontactable. The local iwi authority has not been approached. One performer has asked whether she should stand in the front row because she has her period. Another performer, who is non-binary, has been suggested by the tutor for the kaitātaki wāhine role. The pōwhiri is in three weeks, and the group has had two rehearsals.
1. Should the rōpū agree to the wero? Reason through the mandate question.
Read the worked answer
A wero is not a floor show with a weapon in it. It is a formal challenge with conditions attached.
- Mandate at the place. A pōwhiri at the civic centre is hosted by tangata whenua of that place. A tertiary rōpū is most likely a guest, not the host. If the local iwi authority has not been approached, the rōpū would be performing a host's role without a host's mandate. That is the first obstacle and it is fatal on its own.
- A challenger of standing. A wero requires someone with the training and the standing to carry it. A 21-person student rōpū with two rehearsals is unlikely to have that person available.
- A briefed visiting party. The delegation must know to pick up the taki, and there must be someone to respond. An unbriefed trade delegation in a polished atrium is a safety risk as well as a protocol failure.
- Space. The atrium is hard, enclosed and public. A taiha needs room and a safe line of movement.
Advice: accept the pōwhiri, decline the wero, and say why in writing. Offer a haka pōwhiri inside the atrium with the karanga at the door. Advise the council to approach the local iwi authority before anything is confirmed; if the iwi takes the lead, the rōpū's role changes to support, which is the correct relationship.
2. Address the livestream and the missing water source together.
Read the worked answer
These look like two logistics problems; they are one tikanga problem with two symptoms - the council has designed the event without the parts that make it safe.
Water. Water is used to lift tapu and to whakanoa, and many pōwhiri use a bowl and a branch at the door. 'No water source' is solvable: fill a large bowl beforehand, bring a branch, arrange for a second bowl inside, and nominate a person to manage it. If the building cannot support that, move the pōwhiri to a space that can. Do not run the event and improvise.
Livestream. Three consents are needed, and the council has sought none.
- The manuhiri. Some delegations refuse filming on principle; a trade delegation may have its own protocol.
- The performers. Images, names and any minors need individual consent, and a livestream cannot be recalled.
- The tikanga of the moment. The karanga and the wero are frequently not filmed; a haka may be, with agreement.
Proposal: no live filming of the karanga or wero; one wide-angle camera for the haka only; a written filming agreement signed before the day; a named person with authority to stop the feed. If the council will not agree, film the speeches and not the haka. The principle to state: filming is a relationship, not a broadcast right.
3. Advise on the front-row question, the performer who is menstruating, and the kaitātaki wāhine role for a non-binary performer.
Read the worked answer
Treat these as three separate questions that share one rule: roles are assigned for reasons, and the reasons must be said aloud.
The front row. The front row is a role, not a privilege. The manuhiri rangatira sits there, and the hosts' karanga and whaikōrero are addressed there. The visiting minister sits in the front row because she leads the delegation, not because she is a woman. That part of the council's plan is probably correct; it is for the hosts to arrange with the delegation, not for the events officer to seat like a conference.
The performer who is menstruating. Tapu is a state, not a judgment on worth. Many rōpū would not place a menstruating performer in the front row or in the karanga role; others would, and leave the decision to her. With the kaitiaki uncontactable, the rōpū should agree its own process before the day, tell the performer what the options are, and let her choose. What must not happen is a rule invented on the morning by whoever is most anxious.
The non-binary performer. Kaitātaki roles are often described as tāne and wāhine, but the underlying requirements are a strong voice, standing in the group and the ability to lead. Three weeks is not long to test a new role. Talk it through with the local iwi, be honest with the performer about the risk of being made into a test case, and separate the question 'can this person lead' from 'should this pōwhiri be where we find out'. If the answer to the second is no, that is a scheduling decision, not a rejection.