Ohio Assessments for Educators: Assessment of Professional Knowledge (grade-band-neutral preparation) study materials
Ohio Assessments for Educators: Assessment of Professional Knowledge (grade-band-neutral preparation) study resources

Sixth-Grade Math Team: To Curve or Not to Curve

Ohio Assessments for Educators: Assessment of Professional Knowledge (grade-band-neutral preparation) · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Sixth-Grade Math Team: To Curve or Not to Curve

A sixth-grade mathematics team has 112 students across five classes. They wrote a 25-item unit test: 15 items on ratio reasoning, 6 on fraction division, and 4 on vocabulary. The test was given in one 45-minute period. Team scores range from 38 to 96 percent, and the five teachers disagree about whether to curve. Two teachers allowed calculators on all items; three allowed calculators only on fraction items. One teacher gave partial credit for correct reasoning with an arithmetic slip, while others marked those answers wrong. The longest word problem is 118 words and includes a table students must interpret. The team has item-level data but no written scoring guide. They meet tomorrow for 30 minutes. The assistant principal wants a decision that can be defended to families and used to plan reteaching.

1. What should the team examine before deciding whether to curve, and why?

Read the worked answer

Before curving, the team should examine whether the scores mean the same thing across classes. Review item alignment to the ratio and fraction standards, item difficulty and discrimination, the reading load of the 118-word problem, calculator rules, accommodations, and scoring of constructed responses. The missing scoring guide and the partial-credit disagreement are serious comparability problems. A curve could hide invalid items or inconsistent administration. The team should separate score adjustment from reteaching. If an item was ambiguous or misaligned, revise or rescore it with evidence. Do not curve only because the average is low.

2. Propose a 30-minute meeting agenda that produces a defensible decision.

Read the worked answer

Use the 30 minutes for a decision, not a general discussion. Minutes 0 to 5: agree that the goal is comparable and defensible scores. Minutes 5 to 12: review the scoring guide and sample responses for constructed items. Minutes 12 to 20: examine flagged items for alignment, reading load, and calculator effects. Minutes 20 to 26: decide on specific actions, such as rescoring only where scoring was inconsistent or dropping only an invalid item. Minutes 26 to 30: assign who will plan reteaching and who will draft the family message. Record the rationale and keep the original scores.

3. How should the team use results for instruction and communicate with families?

Read the worked answer

Use item-level data to group students by misconception, not by overall score. Reteach the weakest ratio and fraction ideas with fresh problems, and give a short reassessment if policy allows. Separate the learning response from the grade response. In the family message, explain what students will practice, what support is available, and how any scoring decision was made. Avoid ranking students or blaming teachers. If the team rescored an item, state the reason briefly. The goal is to preserve trust and make the next instructional step clear.