OH Dental Jurisprudence study materials
OH Dental Jurisprudence study resources

Suspicious Injuries on a Pediatric Patient

OH Dental Jurisprudence · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Suspicious Injuries on a Pediatric Patient

A 7-year-old patient presents with a chipped tooth and a bruised upper lip. During the exam, the dentist notices additional bruises in various stages of healing on the child’s back and arms. The child flinches when the dentist raises a hand and avoids eye contact. The parent explains that the child is 'clumsy' and falls often. The dentist suspects possible physical abuse but is unsure and worried about breaking trust with the family. The dentist has treated the child for three years and knows the family well. The dental office is in a small Ohio town. The dentist considers calling the family’s pediatrician first to discuss the findings. The child has no other visible injuries. The parent is present throughout the exam and becomes defensive when asked about the bruises.

1. What are the dentist’s legal obligations regarding reporting suspected child abuse in Ohio?

Read the worked answer

Ohio law makes dentists mandated reporters of suspected child abuse or neglect. The dentist must report to the county children services agency or local law enforcement. The duty is personal and cannot be delegated to an office manager. The report must be made immediately or as soon as practicable. The dentist should not investigate, confront the parent, or attempt to verify the abuse independently. The dentist’s suspicion is enough. The report should include the child’s name, age, and the nature of the injuries. Ohio provides immunity for good-faith reports. Calling the pediatrician first is not a substitute for a report and could cause delay.

2. What is the legal standard for reporting, and does the dentist need proof?

Read the worked answer

The standard is 'reasonable cause to suspect' abuse or neglect. The dentist does not need proof, certainty, or confirmation. The bruises in various stages of healing, the child’s flinching, and the inconsistent explanation are sufficient to create reasonable suspicion. The dentist’s personal relationship with the family does not override the duty. The law is designed to protect children, and the threshold is intentionally low. If the dentist is unsure, the correct course is to report and let the agency investigate. Failing to report because of loyalty to the family is not a defense.

3. What are the consequences of failing to report?

Read the worked answer

Failure to report suspected child abuse is a criminal offense under Ohio law, typically a misdemeanor, and can also lead to discipline by the Ohio State Dental Board for unprofessional conduct. The Board may impose a reprimand, fine, suspension, or other sanction. In civil litigation, failure to report could be used as evidence of negligence if the child is later harmed. The dentist’s license and reputation are at risk. The law encourages reporting by providing immunity for good-faith reports, so the risk of reporting is low compared with the risk of not reporting. The dentist should document the findings and the report.