Two Daughters, One Directive
Harold, an 84-year-old widower, died in a hospital. He was survived by daughters Amy (Ohio) and Beth (Texas), son Carl (Ohio), and his companion Rosa. Five years ago Harold signed a notarized document naming Amy as his agent for disposition of his remains. Two years ago he signed a written funeral directive requesting graveside burial with military honors and naming Beth to carry out those instructions. He later told Rosa several times that he wanted cremation. Amy signed a hospital release directing the body to Serenity Funeral Home. Beth arrived with the directive and demanded release to Oak Hill Funeral Home. Carl agrees with Amy that burial was Harold's wish. The hospital has not released the body. Serenity has already picked up the body and scheduled embalming. No one has provided a court order. Rosa says Harold "hated Amy" and only named her because she was the oldest.
1. Who has the legal right to control disposition, and how should the two documents be evaluated?
Read the worked answer
Ohio's right-of-disposition statute sets a priority list, but it also allows a person to appoint an agent in a written, signed, and notarized document. The notarized appointment naming Amy is presumptively valid. The later funeral directive naming Beth may be a valid written directive, and later instructions can supersede earlier ones if they meet statutory requirements and are not revoked. The key is not simply "oldest child" or "companion." The funeral home must examine both documents for date, signature, notarization or witnessing, and scope. The directive requests burial and names Beth to carry out those instructions; the appointment names Amy as agent generally. A court may need to reconcile them. Rosa's statement about cremation is oral, lower priority, and may be self-interested or unreliable; it does not override a valid written instrument. Carl's agreement with Amy is not itself authority.
2. What should Serenity Funeral Home do now, and what actions should it avoid?
Read the worked answer
Serenity should stop the embalming unless it has clear authorization from the person with legal priority, because embalming is irreversible and may conflict with a cremation request. It should not release the body to either funeral home until authority is confirmed. It should request original or legible copies of both documents, verify signatures and dates, and ask Harold's attorney or the drafter for records. It should document every call and keep the body refrigerated. It should not rely on the hospital release alone, because the hospital is not the final arbiter. It should tell both daughters that it will hold the remains and seek a court order if they cannot agree. It should avoid taking sides, avoid disparaging either daughter, and avoid accepting payment that implies a chosen provider. If a court order arrives, it should follow it.
3. If the dispute remains unresolved, what options are available and what records should be kept?
Read the worked answer
Serenity or either daughter may file an action in probate court for a declaratory judgment or an order determining the right of disposition. The funeral home may also interplead the body or seek instructions. It should preserve the signed authorization, the release, the two documents, refrigeration logs, and all communications. It should not cremate or embalm without authority, because damages may include emotional distress and statutory penalties. If the family agrees on a temporary plan, the funeral home should get it in writing signed by all parties with claimed priority. The Board generally does not resolve family disputes; it enforces licensing and facility rules. The funeral home's best protection is a clear record showing it did not choose sides and acted prudently.