Firearms Failure and a Solicited Score Change
Cadet Morgan is in week 14 of a roughly six-month residential academy. The firearms standard requires an 80% qualification score in both daylight and low-light courses. Morgan has scored 72%, 76%, and 74%; the range officer reports she is safe and follows commands but anticipates recoil and rushes the trigger. She also scored 68% on the legal block exam, below the 70% remediation threshold. The tactical training sergeant recommends recycling her to the next class. A classmate who is a range assistant offers to 'pencil in' a passing score so she can stay with her class and avoid a six-month delay. Morgan asks the classmate to do it. Another cadet reports this to the range officer. The academy commander must decide what happens to Morgan, the classmate, and the remediation plan.
1. What are the integrity issues and what immediate actions should the commander take?
Read the worked answer
The immediate issue is attempted falsification of a qualification record, not just a failing score. The range officer should stop any score change, secure the original score sheets and the electronic record, and notify the academy commander. Morgan solicited the change; the classmate offered it. Both should be interviewed separately, given notice of the allegations, and afforded the academy's disciplinary process. The commander should preserve the distinction between performance failure and integrity violation: the former can be remediated; the latter goes to fitness for a law-enforcement career. A cadet who asks to have a score falsified has shown willingness to deceive, which is directly relevant to courtroom testimony and report integrity. The commander should consider suspension, dismissal, or a formal integrity review, and should document why the sanction is proportional.
2. Design a remediation plan for Morgan's firearms and legal deficits.
Read the worked answer
The remediation plan should target the diagnosed deficits. For firearms, the range officer should use diagnostic target review, dry-fire practice, trigger-control drills, recoil-management coaching, and low-light repetitions; Morgan should be retested only after demonstrating consistent grouping and safe handling, not after a single good string. For the legal block, she should receive tutoring on the specific missed domains, a practice exam, and a retest at or above 70%. The plan should set a defined remediation period, a maximum number of retests, and a clear consequence if the standard is not met - likely recycling to the next class. The 80% standard should not be lowered. All sessions, scores, and instructor observations should be documented.
3. What should the commander document, and how should the decision be communicated?
Read the worked answer
The commander should prepare a written decision that separates the two tracks: performance remediation and integrity discipline. The memo should list the original scores and dates, remediation provided, retest results, the solicitation and offer, witness statements, and the sanction. Morgan and the classmate should receive written notice and an opportunity to respond. The academy should retain the original and any corrected records; no altered score should enter the official file. Communication to the class should be limited to the policy lesson - qualification standards and integrity - without humiliating individuals. If dismissal is imposed, the notice should cite the academy standard and the appeal route.