Juvenile, Video, and Medical Information in an Open Crash Investigation
After a crash involving a school bus and a 16-year-old driver, a television reporter submits a written request for: (1) the complete OH-1 crash report; (2) the trooper's dash-camera video; (3) the names, dates of birth, and addresses of the bus driver and the juvenile; and (4) the juvenile's medical treatment information from the report. The crash occurred three days ago; the investigation is open because the bus driver's commercial driver's license status and hours-of-service records are still being verified. The department's public records officer has the file. The school district's attorney sends a letter asking that the juvenile's name be withheld 'to protect the student.' The reporter says she will publish in 24 hours and threatens a mandamus action if the records are not released immediately.
1. Which requested items are public records, and which should be redacted or withheld?
Read the worked answer
The crash report is generally a public record, but it is not released without review. The officer should redact Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, medical treatment information, and any other information that a statute exempts; a redaction log should identify the legal basis for each redaction. The dash-camera video is generally a public record, but it may contain the same protected information or images of minors, so it should be reviewed and redacted where necessary. The juvenile's name is not automatically exempt merely because the school district asks; the public records officer should apply the specific Ohio statutes and case law, not the school attorney's preference. The juvenile's medical treatment information is different: it should be withheld as protected medical information unless a specific release applies.
2. What response timing and format does Ohio public records law require, and how should any denial be structured?
Read the worked answer
Ohio's Public Records Act requires a prompt response and release within a reasonable time, not a blanket 24-hour deadline. The officer should acknowledge the request in writing, identify what will be produced, provide a reasonable estimate if review will take longer, and state any denial in writing with the legal authority for each withholding. The response should be itemized by request: report, video, names and identifiers, and medical information. If a record is redacted rather than denied, the officer should say so and provide the redaction basis. The officer should keep a log of the request, the response, and the records produced. A mandamus threat does not justify releasing exempt information, but unexplained delay increases risk.
3. How should the open investigation affect release of the crash facts?
Read the worked answer
An open investigation is not a blanket exemption from the Public Records Act. Basic crash facts, the report, and generally the video remain releasable unless a specific exemption applies or release would compromise the investigation in a way the law recognizes. The officer should separate verified facts from pending checks: the CDL status and hours-of-service verification are not yet confirmed, so the department should not release them as findings. The officer may withhold a narrow portion of investigative work product if release would impede the case, but should release the rest and explain the withholding in writing. The department should coordinate with legal counsel and avoid letting the school district's request control the legal analysis.