OH Optometry Jurisprudence study materials
OH Optometry Jurisprudence study resources

A Minor, a Grandmother, and a Request for Confidential Records

OH Optometry Jurisprudence · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

A Minor, a Grandmother, and a Request for Confidential Records

A 16-year-old boy comes to Dr. Lopez’s office with his grandmother for a first eye examination. He reports headaches and blurry distance vision and wants contact lenses. His mother is at work and gives verbal permission by telephone; his father is not involved in the visit. The grandmother asks to stay in the room. The boy later asks Dr. Lopez not to tell his parents that he wants contact lenses because he plans to pay for them himself. Dr. Lopez wants to dilate the pupils to evaluate the fundus. The grandmother says she does not understand why dilation is needed and asks whether the boy can consent for himself.

1. Can Dr. Lopez examine and dilate the patient based on the grandmother’s presence and the mother’s telephone permission? What should be documented?

Read the worked answer

Dr. Lopez should confirm who has legal authority to consent for this minor. A grandparent may bring the patient, but the grandmother’s presence alone does not establish authority to consent to treatment. The mother’s telephone permission can be acceptable if the office verifies her identity and authority, but the better practice is to document the date, time, telephone number, the specific consent given, and who spoke with her. Dilation is a diagnostic procedure that requires informed consent; the doctor should explain the purpose, risks, and alternatives in terms the guardian and patient understand. If the mother has legal custody and consents, the examination and dilation may proceed. If authority is unclear or contested, the office should postpone nonurgent care until written consent is obtained.

2. How should Dr. Lopez respond to the boy’s request to keep the contact lens discussion from his parents?

Read the worked answer

Dr. Lopez should not promise absolute confidentiality that the law may not support. A 16-year-old may have a legitimate interest in privacy, but a parent or legal guardian generally has the right to access a minor’s health records and to consent to treatment. The doctor should explain to the patient what will be shared, why, and with whom, and should encourage the patient to involve his mother. If the contact lens request is elective and payment is the only issue, the office can discuss payment options without disclosing clinical details beyond what the guardian needs for consent. If there is a safety concern, such as a condition requiring treatment, the guardian must be informed. The record should document the confidentiality discussion and the patient’s wishes.

3. The grandmother demands a copy of the record at the end of the visit. What should the office do?

Read the worked answer

The office should verify whether the grandmother is authorized to receive the record. Being the accompanying adult is not the same as being the personal representative or legal guardian. If the mother has authorized the grandmother in writing, or if the grandmother holds legal authority, the office may release a copy under the practice’s records policy and any applicable fee. If not, the office should politely decline and explain that the parent or legal guardian must request the records. The office should not release records to the patient’s father merely because he is a parent if his custody or authority is disputed; it should seek clarification. Document the request, the verification, and the response.