The Lapsed Qualifying Contractor
Sooner Comfort LLC holds an Oklahoma mechanical contractor license with the owner as qualifying party. The license expired March 31. On April 10 the company is still bidding and installing a $28,000 residential replacement. The owner has been out of state; the office manager says the renewal check was mailed but not cashed. A journeyman employee, Marcus, has a valid Oklahoma journeyman mechanical license and has been running the crew and pulling permits in the company's name. On April 18 a CIB inspector sees the company truck at a job site and asks for the license and permit. The company's insurance certificate is current. The homeowner has paid a 50% deposit and the old equipment has been removed. The office manager asks whether Marcus can 'sign off' the job so the crew can finish.
1. Identify the licensing violations and explain whether Marcus's journeyman license authorizes him to contract, bid, or pull permits for the company.
Read the worked answer
The company appears to be contracting without a valid mechanical contractor license because its license expired March 31. A mailed renewal check does not keep the license active; the board must receive and approve the renewal. Marcus's journeyman license allows him to perform mechanical work under a licensed contractor, but it does not authorize him to enter contracts, submit bids, or hold the company out as licensed. Pulling permits in the company's name while the contractor license is expired creates a separate problem: the permit application may contain a false statement about licensure, and the inspection department may treat the permits as invalid. The inspector should be shown the actual license status, not the insurance certificate. The company should stop bidding, contracting, and pulling new permits until the license is reinstated.
2. What must the company do to resume lawful operations, and what should happen to the work already installed?
Read the worked answer
The qualifying party should contact the Construction Industries Board immediately, pay any late or reinstatement fees, submit the required continuing-education documentation, and correct any other deficiency. The company should not accept new contracts or pull new permits until the board shows the license as active. For the job already underway, the company should disclose the lapse to the homeowner in writing and coordinate with the local inspection authority. Existing permits may need to be reissued or reapproved, and the work already installed should be inspected before it is covered. If the company cannot reinstate promptly, it should arrange for a properly licensed contractor to take over the permit and contract, with the homeowner's written consent. Marcus should not sign off the job as if he were the contractor.
3. What are the risks to the homeowner and to Marcus?
Read the worked answer
The homeowner faces delays, possible failed inspections, warranty uncertainty, and difficulty proving who is responsible if the job is defective. An unlicensed contractor may also have trouble enforcing the contract or may lack the insurance and bonding protections the homeowner expected. Marcus faces disciplinary exposure if he acted as the qualifying contractor, pulled permits improperly, or supervised work while the company was unlicensed. He could also be personally exposed if an injury or property damage occurs on a job he was running without proper contractor authority. The company faces civil penalties, cease-and-desist action, and possible loss of the license. The safest course is to stop work that requires a contractor license, correct the license status, and document every communication with the board, the inspector, and the homeowner.