Restaurant Coinsurance and Business Income
A fire damages a family-owned restaurant in Norman. The commercial property policy has an 80% coinsurance clause and separate limits: building $1,200,000; business personal property $300,000; business income and extra expense $500,000. The insured reports replacement cost values of $1,500,000 for the building, $450,000 for business personal property, and $720,000 for annual business income and continuing expenses. The fire causes $400,000 in building damage, $90,000 in personal property damage, and a four-month shutdown. The insured's accountant calculates $240,000 in business income loss during the shutdown and $60,000 in extra expense to use a temporary kitchen and rent equipment. The policy has a $5,000 deductible and no endorsement changing the coinsurance or business income terms.
1. Calculate the building, business personal property, and business income recoveries, showing coinsurance and deductible treatment. State any assumptions.
Read the worked answer
Building: the required limit is 80% of $1,500,000, or $1,200,000. The insured carries $1,200,000, so there is no coinsurance penalty. The loss is $400,000, less the $5,000 deductible, for a building recovery of $395,000, subject to the $1,200,000 limit.
Business personal property: the required limit is 80% of $450,000, or $360,000. The insured carries $300,000, so the coinsurance fraction is 300,000 divided by 360,000, or 0.8333. The adjusted loss before deductible is $90,000 times 0.8333, or $75,000. After the $5,000 deductible, the recovery is $70,000. If the policy applies one deductible per occurrence rather than per coverage, the deductible should not be taken three times; the adjuster must read the deductible clause. The calculation above assumes a separate deductible applies to each coverage part, which is common but not universal.
Business income: the required limit is 80% of $720,000, or $576,000. The insured carries $500,000, so the fraction is 500,000 divided by 576,000, or 0.8681. The four-month loss is $240,000 times 0.8681, or $208,333. Extra expense is usually not subject to business income coinsurance, so the $60,000 is payable up to the extra expense limit, subject to the deductible and proof that it reduced the shutdown loss.
2. How should the public adjuster handle the period of restoration and extra expense to avoid over- or under-stating the business income claim?
Read the worked answer
The adjuster should define the period of restoration from the date of physical damage until the property could reasonably be repaired or replaced with due diligence, not until the owner actually reopens. Delays caused by the insured, such as waiting for a contractor or changing the menu, generally do not extend the period. Delays caused by the insurer, permits, or unavailable specialized equipment may extend it if documented.
The adjuster should build a month-by-month income worksheet showing revenue, variable costs that stop during shutdown, continuing expenses such as rent, insurance, and salaried management, and the net loss. Extra expense must be tied to expenses that reduce the shutdown loss, such as renting a temporary kitchen or equipment. The adjuster should not let the insurer treat all extra expense as ordinary business income, and should not claim extra expense that the insured would have incurred anyway.
A common trap is using the accountant's annual figure without adjusting for seasonality. A restaurant may have stronger and weaker months; the four-month loss should reflect the actual months of shutdown. The adjuster should also check whether the policy uses a 12-month business income period, whether payroll is included, and whether the insured has ordinary payroll exclusion. The presentation should reconcile the accountant's number to the policy's definition of business income.
3. What common valuation disputes should the adjuster anticipate in a restaurant loss?
Read the worked answer
The adjuster should expect disputes over replacement cost versus actual cash value, betterment, code upgrades, and the value of specialty equipment. The insurer may depreciate ovens, refrigeration, and furniture; the insured may claim replacement cost without documenting age and condition. The adjuster should obtain the equipment schedule, purchase invoices, and photographs, and should separate items that can be cleaned or repaired from those that must be replaced.
Business income disputes often center on continuing expenses, owner's compensation, and whether the business would have been profitable during the shutdown. The insurer may argue that the restaurant was underperforming or that the owner's salary is not a continuing expense. The adjuster should use profit-and-loss statements, tax returns, payroll records, and pre-loss projections. Extra expense claims need receipts and proof of necessity.
Coinsurance is another pressure point. The insurer may apply the coinsurance penalty using its own valuation of the property, which can increase the penalty. The adjuster should independently verify replacement cost values and challenge inflated insurer values if they are not supported. The adjuster should also confirm whether the policy has agreed value, replacement cost, or a coinsurance exception for business income. The goal is to make the carrier apply the clause consistently and to document every assumption.