The Ambiguous Library Notice
The student library board has drafted this 42-word notice for the hallway: 'Students who have not returned books borrowed before the winter break by Friday will be charged a replacement fee, and their borrowing privileges will be suspended until the matter is resolved with the librarian.' Priya reads it as covering only books borrowed before break. Marcus reads it as covering every overdue book after Friday. Elena reads it as charging a fee only for pre-break books. The librarian's actual rule is different: every book due before Friday counts, no matter when it was borrowed; a replacement fee is charged only for books still missing after Friday; and suspension applies to any student with an unpaid fee. The board votes on revisions Friday, and the notice prints Monday.
1. Whose reading does the sentence's grammar most support - Priya's, Marcus's, or Elena's? Name the exact phrase that does the work, and say whether fixing the grammar alone would make the notice match the librarian's rule.
Read the worked answer
Where the sentence bends
- The phrase 'by Friday' sits between two possible anchors: the returning ('have not returned ... by Friday') or the borrowing ('borrowed ... by Friday').
- The natural attachment is to 'returned': the deadline governs the act of returning, not when the books were borrowed.
- That leaves 'borrowed before the winter break' as a restrictive modifier on 'books' - it narrows the set of books the notice is about to pre-break borrowings.
Who is closest Priya and Elena, whose readings both limit the notice to pre-break books. Marcus's reading needs 'by Friday' to modify 'borrowed', which is strained and produces a near-contradiction ('borrowed before the winter break and by Friday').
Does grammar save the notice? No. Even the grammatically favoured reading covers only pre-break books, while the librarian's rule covers every book due before Friday. The mismatch is in the wording, not only in the parsing, so re-reading cannot fix it - the notice must be rewritten.
2. Rewrite the notice in 30 words or fewer so that it matches the librarian's actual rule, and explain two choices you made.
Read the worked answer
Rewrite (29 words): 'All books due before Friday must be returned by Friday. After Friday, students with books still missing pay a replacement fee and lose borrowing privileges until the fee is paid.'
Why this works
- Deleting 'borrowed before the winter break' removes the restriction that caused all three misreadings; 'all books due before Friday' matches policy exactly.
- Splitting into two sentences separates the deadline from the consequence, so 'by Friday' has only one possible anchor.
- 'The matter' is replaced by its real referent, 'the fee'.
- 'Missing' replaces 'not returned', which a hallway reader could take to mean 'never borrowed'.
3. Marcus proposes inserting the word 'any': '...have not returned any books borrowed before the winter break by Friday...' Does that bring the notice in line with the librarian's rule? Explain.
Read the worked answer
No. 'Any' widens the quantity inside the restricted set - it says every pre-break book must come back - but 'borrowed before the winter break' still excludes anything borrowed after break, which the librarian's rule covers. It also leaves 'until the matter is resolved' untouched.
Marcus's edit strengthens the wrong half of the sentence. The fault is a restriction, and no intensifier removes a restriction; the phrase has to be deleted or replaced with a time test ('due before Friday') that matches the policy.