Sense Selection on 'Sustain': When Translation Fails
Nadia is taking the 20-item vocabulary section. Four items use sustain in different senses, a deliberate feature of this paper. (a) 'The wing of the aircraft sustained damage during landing.' (b) 'The author sustained her argument with three case studies.' (c) 'Sustained economic growth requires stable energy prices.' (d) 'The witness could not sustain her account under questioning.' In Nadia's first language one verb covers both 'keep going' and 'suffer', so she reads (a) as 'kept going' and rejects 'suffered' as too negative for a formal academic text. She answers (a) incorrectly, spends 70 seconds on it when the section allows about 45 seconds per item, then rushes (c). She gets (b) right by guessing from 'support'. Three minutes remain for six items.
1. Why does the translation strategy fail in (a)? Give the correct sense and the collocation evidence.
Read the worked answer
Correct sense: 'suffered' / 'underwent'. The object decides the sense. In English, damage, injury, loss, defeat and structural damage are things you sustain in the undergo sense: the subject is a patient, not an agent. The 'keep going' sense needs an abstract object maintained over time - growth, interest, effort, a note.
So this is not a vocabulary gap but a sense-selection error. Her L1 collapses two senses into one verb, so the English form looks familiar and she stops checking. The context rules out 'kept going' decisively: a wing cannot maintain damage, it can only receive it.
The discipline she needs is to ask who is doing what to whom before translating, and to read the noun after the verb. Nadia rejected the right answer for a stylistic reason ('too negative'), which is a judgement about tone applied to a text that is describing an accident.
2. Distinguish the senses in (b), (c) and (d), and propose a study routine that would prevent the error.
Read the worked answer
(b) sustained her argument = supported, held up; the case studies are props under a claim. (c) sustained growth = continued over time without interruption; here it is attributive and positive. (d) sustain her account = maintain it under challenge, closest to (b) but adversarial in flavour.
Four forms, three senses: undergo (a), support or withstand (b, d), continue (c).
A routine should be organised by sense, not by word - one card per sense with two real collocates each: 'sustain an injury', 'sustain heavy losses'; 'sustain growth', 'sustained effort'; 'sustain an argument', 'objection sustained'. Nadia's guess in (b) worked, but it was not a method: 'support' happens to be a near-synonym, and that luck will not hold for (c).
3. Was 70 seconds on item (a) a reasonable spend? Advise her on pacing.
Read the worked answer
No. The section allows about 45 seconds per item, and she still had six items when she finished (a). Spending 70 seconds on an item she had already answered wrongly bought nothing: she had no new evidence to weigh, only discomfort.
Rule: a first answer gets one confirmation pass, not open-ended re-deliberation. If meaning and collocation both check out, commit and move. If two options survive, mark the item, answer provisionally, and return only after the last item.
A better use of those 70 seconds was reviewing (c) and the five remaining items, where unfamiliar senses were more likely to be wrong than the item she had already reasoned through.