Telehealth Across State Lines and an Unlicensed Aide
Dr. Nguyen has held an Oregon chiropractic license since 2014 and moved to Vancouver, Washington, in 2023. She continues to treat Oregon patients through a video platform: she observes range of motion, prescribes home exercises, and advises on ergonomics, billing each session as a chiropractic office visit. Her Oregon clinic is staffed by an unlicensed front-desk employee, Mr. Cole, who places patients on intersegmental traction tables, applies electrical stimulation pads, and writes "treatment rendered" in the chart for Dr. Nguyen's signature. Mr. Cole has no board certification. A patient's spouse complains to the Board that Mr. Cole "cracked" the patient's neck during a session; Mr. Cole says he only "stretched" it. Dr. Nguyen reviews and signs the notes weekly. The Board requests her records and asks whether her telehealth visits are lawful.
1. Is Dr. Nguyen's telehealth practice lawful, and what licensure principle controls?
Read the worked answer
Oregon licensure follows the patient's location. Dr. Nguyen holds an Oregon license, so she may provide chiropractic services to patients located in Oregon by telehealth, provided she meets the same standard of care as in person: adequate history, examination (which may be limited), diagnosis, informed consent, documentation, and referral resources. She may not prescribe medications, and she should verify the patient's identity and physical location at each visit. Billing a video visit as an office visit is permissible only if the service and documentation support that code. Her Washington residence does not remove her from Oregon Board jurisdiction for Oregon patients. If she treats Washington patients, she needs Washington licensure. The Board's question is not whether telehealth is categorically prohibited; it is whether the specific visits met the standard of care and whether she delegated clinical tasks unlawfully.
2. Which tasks may Mr. Cole legally perform, and what is Dr. Nguyen's responsibility?
Read the worked answer
Oregon law does not permit an unlicensed receptionist to perform clinical tasks. Placing patients on traction, applying electrical stimulation, and writing "treatment rendered" are clinical services. Chiropractic assistants who perform clinical support must hold board certification and work under the supervising chiropractor's direction; even then, they may not perform spinal manipulation. Dr. Nguyen is responsible for Mr. Cole's acts. She should immediately stop the delegation, audit the records he touched, notify patients if treatment was provided by an unlicensed person, and consult her attorney about reporting the situation to the Board. Signing weekly does not cure the violation; it aggravates it by showing knowledge. The complaint that Mr. Cole "cracked" a neck, if true, is unlicensed practice and a serious patient-safety event.
3. How should Dr. Nguyen respond to the Board's records request and questions about the complaint?
Read the worked answer
She must cooperate. The Board has subpoena power and may discipline a licensee for failing to respond or for obstructing an investigation. She should provide complete, unaltered records with the audit trail, not a selected "pertinent" set. She may have counsel present at an interview and may ask for the basis of the request, but she cannot simply decline. She should not contact the complainant or ask staff to change testimony. She should preserve all emails, schedules, and billing records. Her response should be truthful and timely. The Board's inquiry about telehealth is an opportunity to show compliance; evasiveness will be treated as a separate problem.