A Billing Complaint, a Records Request, and Altered Charts
Dr. Alvarez receives a certified letter from the Oregon Board of Chiropractic Examiners. A former employee has complained that Dr. Alvarez billed insurance for four units of manual therapy when only two were performed, and that after the complaint was filed, Dr. Alvarez added a sentence to a patient's chart stating "patient reported significant improvement" without dating the entry. The Board requests complete records for 12 patients and an interview. Dr. Alvarez's office manager advises her to send only the "pertinent" pages and to "clean up" the charts before sending. Dr. Alvarez has malpractice insurance and a separate attorney. She asks whether she can decline the interview, whether the complaint is public, and what the Board can do if it finds a violation.
1. Must Dr. Alvarez cooperate with the Board's request? What are the consequences of refusing or altering records?
Read the worked answer
Yes. The Board may investigate complaints and issue subpoenas for records. Failure to cooperate, producing incomplete records, or altering a chart are independent grounds for discipline and can turn a billing issue into a fraud and obstruction case. Dr. Alvarez should preserve all originals, including metadata and audit trails. She may add a dated, signed addendum that clearly identifies the correction and the reason; she must never overwrite, backdate, or delete. The office manager's advice to "clean up" the charts is exactly what she must not do. She may have counsel at the interview and may ask for clarification, but she cannot refuse to appear or answer selectively. If criminal exposure exists, counsel can advise on assertions of privilege, but the Board can still proceed administratively.
2. What dispositions may the Board impose, and what process is due?
Read the worked answer
The Board's dispositions range from dismissal or an advisory letter, through a stipulated agreement with continuing education, audits, or a civil penalty, to probation, suspension, or revocation. The Board must follow contested-case procedure under ORS 183: notice of the specific charges, a hearing, the right to counsel, the right to present evidence and cross-examine, and a written final order. A licensee may appeal the final order to the Court of Appeals. The Board cannot impose discipline without a factual basis and an opportunity to respond. If the billing error was isolated and promptly corrected, that is mitigation; alteration of records is aggravation. Dr. Alvarez should negotiate from a complete record, not from a cleaned-up one.
3. Is the complaint confidential, and may Dr. Alvarez discuss it with patients or staff?
Read the worked answer
Board investigations are generally confidential, but that does not mean Dr. Alvarez can discuss the details freely. She should limit disclosure to her attorney, insurer, and those with a need to know. She should not discuss the complaint with patients or staff in a way that chills cooperation, and she should not contact the complainant. Patient records remain confidential and should be released only as authorized by law or the Board's request. If the matter becomes a formal disciplinary action, the final order is typically public. She should ask the Board's investigator what confidentiality applies and follow that guidance. Confidentiality does not justify withholding records from the Board; it governs how she talks about the investigation outside the process.