The Subpoena for Elena's Records
Rosa is an Oregon LMT in private practice. Client Elena was injured in a rear-end collision and has been receiving massage for whiplash. Elena’s personal injury attorney sends Rosa a subpoena duces tecum for “all records, notes, and billing statements” for Elena, returnable in 10 days. The subpoena is signed by a court clerk but is not accompanied by Elena’s written authorization. Elena has not told Rosa that she wants the records released; in fact, Elena previously said she does not want her employer to know she is in litigation. Rosa’s records include intake forms, SOAP notes mentioning Elena’s anxiety and a prior abortion, and text messages in which Elena discussed settlement offers. Rosa’s malpractice insurer advises her to “just send everything to avoid a court fight.” Rosa wonders whether she must comply, whether she can redact, and what to tell Elena.
1. Must Rosa release the complete record in response to the subpoena? Explain confidentiality, authorization, and court order requirements.
Read the worked answer
No. A subpoena duces tecum is a demand in litigation, but it is not the same as Elena’s written authorization. Rosa should not simply send everything because the insurer says so. She should notify Elena and her attorney promptly, confirm whether Elena authorizes release, and seek a written authorization or a court order. If Elena objects or does not authorize, Rosa may need to respond to the subpoena with an objection or seek guidance from the court; ignoring a valid subpoena can create contempt exposure, but complying without authority can violate confidentiality. The correct path is to preserve records, assert the confidentiality/privilege issue, and produce only what is legally required after authorization or court order.
2. What should Rosa do with the text messages and sensitive notes, and how should she communicate with Elena?
Read the worked answer
Rosa should preserve the entire record, including intake, SOAP notes, billing, and texts. The texts with settlement discussions may be relevant, but they are still client communications; she should not selectively destroy them. She should separate truly sensitive information from the treatment record only if the law allows redaction; she should not redact to hide relevant treatment. She should tell Elena plainly: a subpoena arrived, no records have been released, and Elena should consult her attorney. Rosa should document the notice and her decision. She should not send records to the insurer or attorney without checking authorization. If the court orders production, she should comply with the order and produce only the ordered material.
3. If Rosa releases records without authorization and Elena is harmed, what regulatory and civil exposure could follow?
Read the worked answer
Unauthorized release could trigger a Board complaint for violating client confidentiality, discipline, and civil claims for invasion of privacy or negligence. Elena could lose trust and suffer harm because her employer or others learn about the litigation, anxiety, and prior abortion. Rosa’s malpractice insurer may defend her, but the insurer’s blanket advice does not override her legal duties. She should notify her insurer of the subpoena, but make the confidentiality decision with legal counsel. She should document all communications and avoid discussing the case outside privileged channels. The safest course is no release without Elena’s authorization or a court order.